Use of clinical practice guidelines and factors related to their uptake: a survey of health professionals in Spain

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Use of clinical practice guidelines and factors related to their uptake: a survey of health professionals in Spain
المؤلفون: Kotzeva, A, Guillamon, I, Gracia, J, del Campo, PD, Gich, I, Calderon, E, Gaminde, I, Louro-Gonzalez, A, Martinez, F, Orrego, C, Rotaeche, R, Salcedo, F, Alonso-Coello, P
المصدر: JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE
r-IIB SANT PAU. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica del Instituto de Investigación Biomédica Sant Pau
instname
بيانات النشر: WILEY, 2014.
سنة النشر: 2014
مصطلحات موضوعية: barriers to uptake, primary care, patterns, hospital, adoption, clinical practice guidelines
الوصف: Rationale, aims and objectiveThis study aims to assess the use of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) among health professionals and factors related to their uptake in clinical practice. MethodsCross-sectional study based on an online survey conducted among primary care (PC) and hospital-based care (HC) doctors in Spain in 2011. Questionnaire development included adaptation of similar surveys and contextualization through a qualitative study. After a pilot study and review, the final survey contained five domains: demographics, involvement in CPGs, consultation of CPGs, perceptions and attitudes regarding CPGs and Spanish NHS CPGs Programme. Professionals from selected health care centres in seven regions were contacted by email with an invitation and link to the Web-based questionnaire. We analysed between-group differences and explored potential predictors of CPGs use by means of a logistic regression. ResultsSix hundred seventy-six doctors responded to the survey (27.7% response rate). 47.1% were PC and 49.5% were HC doctors. 32.5% stated previous involvement in CPGs and 56.5% stated training in research methodology. 67.5% of the surveyed professionals reported using CPGs more than one time per week. The use of a system for classifying the quality of evidence (62.3%) and for grading the strength of the recommendations (58.6%), as well as the use of a rigorous methodology (49.6%), were the most frequently reported aspects related to CPG credibility. The lack of time (56.4%), especially in PC (65.3% versus 49.5% in HC; P
تدمد: 1356-1294
URL الوصول: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=RECOLECTA___::e4fdb4323c86521927fc4cec92d95a96
https://iibsantpau.fundanetsuite.com/Publicaciones/ProdCientif/PublicacionFrw.aspx?id=9275
حقوق: OPEN
رقم الأكسشن: edsair.RECOLECTA.....e4fdb4323c86521927fc4cec92d95a96
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE