ACR Appropriateness Criteria ® Suspected Osteomyelitis, Septic Arthritis, or Soft Tissue Infection (Excluding Spine and Diabetic Foot)

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: ACR Appropriateness Criteria ® Suspected Osteomyelitis, Septic Arthritis, or Soft Tissue Infection (Excluding Spine and Diabetic Foot)
المؤلفون: Francesca D. Beaman, Paul F. von Herrmann, Mark J. Kransdorf, Ronald S. Adler, Behrang Amini, Marc Appel, Erin Arnold, Stephanie A. Bernard, Bennett S. Greenspan, Kenneth S. Lee, Michael J. Tuite, Eric A. Walker, Robert J. Ward, Daniel E. Wessell, Barbara N. Weissman
المصدر: Journal of the American College of Radiology. 14:S326-S337
بيانات النشر: Elsevier BV, 2017.
سنة النشر: 2017
مصطلحات موضوعية: medicine.medical_specialty, medicine.diagnostic_test, business.industry, Osteomyelitis, Soft tissue, Magnetic resonance imaging, medicine.disease, Diabetic foot, Appropriate Use Criteria, 030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging, 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis, medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging, Septic arthritis, Radiology, Medical diagnosis, business, Medical literature
الوصف: Infection of the musculoskeletal system is a common clinical problem. Differentiating soft tissue from osseous infection often determines the appropriate clinical therapeutic course. Radiographs are the recommend initial imaging examination, and although often not diagnostic in acute osteomyelitis, can provide anatomic evaluation and alternative diagnoses influencing subsequent imaging selection and interpretation. MRI with contrast is the examination of choice for the evaluation of suspected osteomyelitis, and MRI, CT, and ultrasound can all be useful in the diagnosis of soft tissue infection. CT or a labeled leukocyte scan and sulfur colloid marrow scan combination are alternative options if MRI is contraindicated or extensive artifact from metal is present. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
تدمد: 1546-1440
URL الوصول: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::03909815c562910909415dc0f6cc9e40
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2017.02.008
حقوق: OPEN
رقم الأكسشن: edsair.doi...........03909815c562910909415dc0f6cc9e40
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE