Peacebuilding Model of Third-Party Mediation in the Philippines: Comparing Malaysia and the OIC
| العنوان: | Peacebuilding Model of Third-Party Mediation in the Philippines: Comparing Malaysia and the OIC |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Rusdi Omar, Che Mohd Aziz Yaacob, Abdul M. Lantong, Shamsuddin L. Taya |
| المصدر: | The Journal of Social Sciences Research. :1151-1157 |
| بيانات النشر: | Academic Research Publishing Group (Publications), 2018. |
| سنة النشر: | 2018 |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: | Government, General Arts and Humanities, media_common.quotation_subject, Peacebuilding, General Social Sciences, Islam, The Republic, Negotiation, Political science, Political economy, Mediation, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Diplomacy, Internal conflict, media_common |
| الوصف: | Many nation-states have increasingly found themselves in a situation where they are unable to sort out their domestic conflicts without third party mediation. This is particularly true for a country like the Government of the Philippines (GPH) who has been fighting violent protracted internal conflicts for many decades against Bangsamoro revolutionary groups. Therefore, with respect to the above, the purpose of this article is to compare peacebuilding models of third party mediation to the Bangsamoro conflicts with particular focus between Malaysia and the Organization of Islamic Conference, presently Cooperation (OIC). Its approach is primarily an eclectic, by concentrating on the strengths and weaknesses of the peacebuilding models of the third party mediation as employed by both Malaysia and OIC. The article is divided into two major parts. The first part discussed both Malaysia and OIC’s diplomatic approaches in dealing with the Bangsamoro conflict, while the second part explained inclusivity versus exclusivity of both Malaysia and the OIC respectively. The study found that Malaysia’s model is more durable and successful when compared to OIC’s. In fact, Malaysia’s quiet diplomacy and less confrontational approach with greater inclusivity were more effective compared to elitist and confrontational approach of the OIC’s mediation to the Bangsamoro conflicts. Indeed, the Government of the Philippines and Moro Islamic Liberation Front (GPH-MILF) peace process is one of the most inclusive peace processes in the world. It may have some who were left out in the peace process, but they were all consulted by both Manila and the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF) as opposed to OIC mediated Government of the Republic of the Philippines and the Moro National Liberation Front (GRP-MNLF) peace negotiations. Therefore, it is pertinent to conclude that there is nothing that resembles the inclusivity of the GPH-MILF peace process that characterized the exclusivity of the GRP-MNLF peace process. |
| تدمد: | 2411-9458 2413-6670 |
| URL الوصول: | https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::488f8129b8cfa59a2086d74129123eb5 https://doi.org/10.32861/jssr.spi6.1151.1157 |
| حقوق: | OPEN |
| رقم الأكسشن: | edsair.doi...........488f8129b8cfa59a2086d74129123eb5 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | OpenAIRE |
| تدمد: | 24119458 24136670 |
|---|