Richard Whitley, Jochen Gläser (eds.), The Changing Governance of the Sciences. The Advent of Research Evaluation Systems. Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook
| العنوان: | Richard Whitley, Jochen Gläser (eds.), The Changing Governance of the Sciences. The Advent of Research Evaluation Systems. Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Jürgen Enders |
| المصدر: | Minerva. 47:465-468 |
| بيانات النشر: | Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2009. |
| سنة النشر: | 2009 |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: | Research Assessment Exercise, Hierarchy, Higher education, business.industry, Corporate governance, Prestige, media_common.quotation_subject, General Social Sciences, Education, Management, Summative assessment, Excellence, Yearbook, Sociology, business, Social Sciences (miscellaneous), media_common |
| الوصف: | In 2009, leading English research universities are facing cuts in their public research funding that make them reconsider their plans for future investment and quite some of them are taking action for cost cuttings. Universities’ leadership are quoted with statements like “potentially the biggest shift in research fuding policy for 20 years” and “it looks like the end of the road for research concentration” (Time Higher Education, no. 1,877, p. 4). What had happened? In December 2008, the results of the most recent Research Assessment Exercise (RAE) had been published, and this RAE provided, for the first time, a ‘research profile’ for each department rather than a single summative score. The RAE thus highlighted not only the ‘critical mass’ of excellent research in leading universities but also small groups or individuals of excellence in departments that, overall, were not rated as excellent. This change in the rules of the game was well-known in advance. What was not well known was the related re-distribution of some research funding towards well evaluated groups in universities that do not figure highly in the well-established and well-defended prestige hierarchy of English universities. The RAE once shocked academe by its declared function of concentrating public research funding in leading universities; this time it was the leading universities that suffered from a change in funding allocations. |
| تدمد: | 1573-1871 0026-4695 |
| URL الوصول: | https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::5abd6d568329a98f66a89c46a654ba18 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-009-9132-4 |
| حقوق: | OPEN |
| رقم الأكسشن: | edsair.doi...........5abd6d568329a98f66a89c46a654ba18 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | OpenAIRE |
| تدمد: | 15731871 00264695 |
|---|