Against Selective Realism(s)
| العنوان: | Against Selective Realism(s) |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Dana Tulodziecki |
| المصدر: | Philosophy of Science. 84:996-1007 |
| بيانات النشر: | Cambridge University Press (CUP), 2017. |
| سنة النشر: | 2017 |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: | History, media_common.quotation_subject, Philosophy, 05 social sciences, 06 humanities and the arts, Pessimism, 050905 science studies, 0603 philosophy, ethics and religion, Epistemology, History and Philosophy of Science, 060302 philosophy, 0509 other social sciences, Realism, media_common |
| الوصف: | It has recently been suggested that realist responses to historical cases featured in pessimistic meta-inductions are not as successful as previously thought. In response, selective realists have updated the basic divide et impera strategy specifically to take such cases into account and to argue that more modern realist accounts are immune to the historical challenge. Using a case study—that of the nineteenth-century zymotic theory of disease—I argue that these updated proposals fail and that even the most sophisticated recent realist accounts remain vulnerable to the challenge from history. |
| تدمد: | 1539-767X 0031-8248 |
| URL الوصول: | https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::5c55ce5ee397b1fce116bdf80f8a058b https://doi.org/10.1086/694004 |
| حقوق: | OPEN |
| رقم الأكسشن: | edsair.doi...........5c55ce5ee397b1fce116bdf80f8a058b |
| قاعدة البيانات: | OpenAIRE |
| تدمد: | 1539767X 00318248 |
|---|