Effect of Pain Reprocessing Therapy vs Placebo and Usual Care for Patients With Chronic Back Pain

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Effect of Pain Reprocessing Therapy vs Placebo and Usual Care for Patients With Chronic Back Pain
المؤلفون: Zachary Anderson, Sona Dimidjian, Mark A. Lumley, Philip A. Kragel, Christie Uipi, Alan Gordon, Laurie Polisky, Karen Knight, Judith Carlisle, Tor D. Wager, Yoni K. Ashar, Thomas F Flood, Stephan Geuter, Howard Schubiner
المصدر: JAMA Psychiatry. 79:13
بيانات النشر: American Medical Association (AMA), 2022.
سنة النشر: 2022
مصطلحات موضوعية: medicine.medical_specialty, business.industry, Psychological intervention, MEDLINE, Telehealth, Placebo, law.invention, Psychiatry and Mental health, Randomized controlled trial, law, Usual care, Physical therapy, Etiology, Back pain, Medicine, medicine.symptom, business
الوصف: Importance Chronic back pain (CBP) is a leading cause of disability, and treatment is often ineffective. Approximately 85% of cases are primary CBP, for which peripheral etiology cannot be identified, and maintenance factors include fear, avoidance, and beliefs that pain indicates injury. Objective To test whether a psychological treatment (pain reprocessing therapy [PRT]) aiming to shift patients' beliefs about the causes and threat value of pain provides substantial and durable pain relief from primary CBP and to investigate treatment mechanisms. Design, setting, and participants This randomized clinical trial with longitudinal functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and 1-year follow-up assessment was conducted in a university research setting from November 2017 to August 2018, with 1-year follow-up completed by November 2019. Clinical and fMRI data were analyzed from January 2019 to August 2020. The study compared PRT with an open-label placebo treatment and with usual care in a community sample. Interventions Participants randomized to PRT participated in 1 telehealth session with a physician and 8 psychological treatment sessions over 4 weeks. Treatment aimed to help patients reconceptualize their pain as due to nondangerous brain activity rather than peripheral tissue injury, using a combination of cognitive, somatic, and exposure-based techniques. Participants randomized to placebo received an open-label subcutaneous saline injection in the back; participants randomized to usual care continued their routine, ongoing care. Main outcomes and measures One-week mean back pain intensity score (0 to 10) at posttreatment, pain beliefs, and fMRI measures of evoked pain and resting connectivity. Results At baseline, 151 adults (54% female; mean [SD] age, 41.1 [15.6] years) reported mean (SD) pain of low to moderate severity (mean [SD] pain intensity, 4.10 [1.26] of 10; mean [SD] disability, 23.34 [10.12] of 100) and mean (SD) pain duration of 10.0 (8.9) years. Large group differences in pain were observed at posttreatment, with a mean (SD) pain score of 1.18 (1.24) in the PRT group, 2.84 (1.64) in the placebo group, and 3.13 (1.45) in the usual care group. Hedges g was -1.14 for PRT vs placebo and -1.74 for PRT vs usual care (P Conclusions and relevance Psychological treatment centered on changing patients' beliefs about the causes and threat value of pain may provide substantial and durable pain relief for people with CBP. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03294148.
تدمد: 2168-622X
URL الوصول: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::9e923e9be472b7cac0dcf939cf546bcb
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.2669
حقوق: OPEN
رقم الأكسشن: edsair.doi...........9e923e9be472b7cac0dcf939cf546bcb
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE