Acute Toxicity Following Ipsilateral Head and Neck Radiation Therapy: Proton vs. Intensity-Modulated Photon Radiotherapy

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Acute Toxicity Following Ipsilateral Head and Neck Radiation Therapy: Proton vs. Intensity-Modulated Photon Radiotherapy
المؤلفون: Joseph I. Kang, Jerry D. Slater, S.M. Sanghvi
المصدر: International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 111:e378
بيانات النشر: Elsevier BV, 2021.
سنة النشر: 2021
مصطلحات موضوعية: Cancer Research, Radiation, business.industry, medicine.medical_treatment, Proton Beam Radiation Therapy, Acute toxicity, Intensity (physics), Radiation therapy, medicine.anatomical_structure, Oncology, Tonsil, Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, Toxicity, Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging, business, Nuclear medicine, Proton therapy
الوصف: Purpose/Objective(s) Given its unique properties, proton beam radiation therapy has the ability to reduce dose to at-risk organs. Proton's Bragg peak gives sharp distal dose fall off, which results in little or no dose beyond this region. As such, ipsilateral head and neck radiation with protons can spare the contralateral side to a greater extent than photon-based radiation, potentially causing reduced acute toxicity. Materials/Methods Eighty-six patients (59 protons and 27 intensity modulated radiation therapy [IMRT]) who received primary or adjuvant ipsilateral head and neck radiation were retrospectively reviewed. Patients received radiation to one side and this must have included at least the parotid region in the treatment field. Primary disease site was major salivary gland in 40, cutaneous in 23, tonsil in 19 and other in 4 patients. Passive scatter proton therapy was delivered with 1-3 fields daily. Median dose delivered was 66 cobalt gray equivalent with protons and 60 gray with IMRT. Results No grade 4 or greater acute mucositis was present in either group. Median acute mucositis was grade 1 for protons and 2 for IMRT. Grade 0, 1, 2 or 3 acute mucositis toxicity was present in 28 (47%), 11 (19%), 17 (29%) and 3 patients (5%) respectively with proton treatment and present in 7 (26%), 3 (11%), 12 (44%) and 5 patients (19%) respectively with IMRT (P = 0.053). Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube was placed during radiation treatment for 1 patient (2%) with protons and 4 patients (15%) for IMRT (P = 0.032). Two patients in the proton group had a PEG tube placed prior to starting radiation and one patient in the IMRT group refused PEG tube placement despite treating physician recommendation. No grade 4 or greater acute radiation dermatitis was experienced by patients in either group. Median acute radiation dermatitis was grade 2 for protons and 2 for IMRT. Grade 0, 1, 2 or 3 toxicity was present in 0 (0%), 7 (12%), 47 (80%) and 4 patients (7%) respectively with proton treatment and present in 0 (0%), 5 (19%), 20 (74%) and 2 patients (7%) respectively with IMRT (P = 0.718). The majority of patients in both treatment groups completed treatment with ≤ 5 days of missed fractions (86.4% with protons, 85.1% with IMRT). Median number of missed treatment days was 2 in both groups. Conclusion Ipsilateral radiation therapy is well tolerated with IMRT and proton based radiation therapy. Fewer patients underwent PEG tube placement in the proton cohort, however these results should be further validated with prospective patient-toxicity centered studies.
تدمد: 0360-3016
URL الوصول: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::b407a4db8b837960c4a9aa547595435e
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.07.1111
حقوق: OPEN
رقم الأكسشن: edsair.doi...........b407a4db8b837960c4a9aa547595435e
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE