Abstract PD1-04: CSMD1 SNPs selectively affect anastrozole response in postmenopausal breast cancer patients
| العنوان: | Abstract PD1-04: CSMD1 SNPs selectively affect anastrozole response in postmenopausal breast cancer patients |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | MP Goetz, Aman U. Buzdar, T Dudenkov, Krishna R. Kalari, J Cairns, Richard M. Weinshilboum, Paul E. Goss, MJ Ellis, L Wang, Mark E. Robson, JN Ingle, Michiaki Kubo, Lois E. Shepherd |
| المصدر: | Cancer Research. 77:PD1-04 |
| بيانات النشر: | American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), 2017. |
| سنة النشر: | 2017 |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: | 0301 basic medicine, Oncology, Cancer Research, medicine.medical_specialty, business.industry, Anastrozole, Single-nucleotide polymorphism, Affect (psychology), medicine.disease, 030226 pharmacology & pharmacy, 03 medical and health sciences, 030104 developmental biology, 0302 clinical medicine, Breast cancer, Internal medicine, Medicine, business, medicine.drug |
| الوصف: | BACKGROUND: Based on prospective clinical trials, there is no evidence for differences in efficacy between the 3 aromatase inhibitors (AIs) anastrozole, exemestane, and letrozole. The purpose of this study was to identify germline genetic variants associated with response to AIs and to help identify novel mechanisms associated with drug disease efficacy. METHODS: A genome-wide association study (GWAS) was performed for 624 patients (Steroids 2015;99:32-38) to identify SNPs associated with estrogen level change in women with estrogen receptor (ER) positive breast cancer treated with anastrozole. Replication of associated SNPs was performed in a GWAS from the MA.27 trial that compared adjuvant anastrozole and exemestane treatment of post-menopausal women with ER+ breast cancer. Functional studies were subsequently performed to determine SNP effects and underlying mechanisms. RESULTS: Our initial GWAS identified SNPs within CSMD1 that were associated with changes in estrogen levels during anastrozole therapy. An additional SNP in CSMD1 was also associated with breast cancer events in CCTG MA.27. Functionally, we showed that CSMD1 regulates CYP19 expression in a SNP-, and in an anastrozole- dependent fashion. These phenomena were not observed for either letrozole or exemestane. In MA.27, an anastrozole- specific effect was also seen with the minor allele having a protective effect on time to distant metastasis (HR=0.49, p=0.00259), but this was not the case for exemestane (HR=0.71, p=0.111). Our in vitro functional studies indicated that overexpression of CSMD1 sensitized anastrozole or letrozole resistant cells to anastrozole but not to the other two AIs. The SNP in CSMD1 that was associated with increased CSMD1 and CYP19 expression levels increased anastrozole sensitivity, but not letrozole or exemestane in lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs) homozygous for either WT or variant CSMD1 SNP genotypes. Based on these observations, we explored whether anastrozole has additional mechanisms beyond its function as a CYP19 inhibitor. Utilizing an estrogen response element (ERE) luciferase reporter assay in a CYP19 CRISPR knockout breast cancer T47D cell line and a surface plasmon resonance (SPR) assay, we found that anastrozole can also function as an ERα agonist, and can bind to, and result in, proteasome dependent ERα degradation, especially in the presence of E2. Treatment of these CYP19 CRISPR knockout cells with anastrozole in the presence of increasing concentrations of E2 results in greater sensitivity compared with anastrozole alone, while the addition of E2, as expected, does not improve letrozole or exemestane sensitivity. These same observations were also seen in letrozole and anastrazole resistant cells. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that anastrozole might be more effective than letrozole or exemestane in patients with the CSMD1 SNP. Furthermore, anastrozole can function as an ERα agonist, binding to ERα and resulting in its degradation, especially in the presence of E2. These findings should help to make it possible to develop precision endocrine therapies for women who are candidates for AIs. Citation Format: Cairns J, Ingle J, Dudenkov T, Kalari K, Buzdar A, Kubo M, Robson M, Ellis M, Goss P, Shepherd L, Goetz M, Weinshilboum R, Wang L. CSMD1 SNPs selectively affect anastrozole response in postmenopausal breast cancer patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD1-04. |
| تدمد: | 1538-7445 0008-5472 |
| URL الوصول: | https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::f531a405bb94f9cf497675a2d33c9991 https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs16-pd1-04 |
| رقم الأكسشن: | edsair.doi...........f531a405bb94f9cf497675a2d33c9991 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | OpenAIRE |
| تدمد: | 15387445 00085472 |
|---|