We assessed whether additional cusp repair during valve-sparing aortic root replacement affects the echocardiographic mid-term results; a subgroup analysis among patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) and tricuspid aortic valve (TAV) was performed.Between June 2002 and May 2015, 157 consecutive patients underwent valve-sparing aortic root replacement with the David technique. Thirty patients (19%) had BAV. In 19 patients (12%), cusp motion or anatomic abnormalities contributed in determining aortic regurgitation requiring an additional cusp repair. Mean follow-up was 7 ± 3.4 years.The cumulative 1-, 5-, and 12-year survival rates were 98%, 94%, and 90%, respectively. Fourteen patients (9%) required aortic valve replacement during follow-up. In 2 patients the underlying cause was bacterial endocarditis. Freedom from aortic valve reoperation was 96% at 1 year, 92% at 5 years, and 89% at 12 years. Reoperation rate was significantly higher (p 0.001) in patients who received leaflet repair compared with patients who did not, with a freedom from reoperation at 8 years of 58% versus 94%. Among patients with BAV, those who did not require cusp repair had a freedom from reoperation at 8 years of 94%, with a significant difference compared with patients who received cusp repair (p = 0.04). Cusp repair did not affect reoperation risk in patients with tricuspid aortic valve.Adjunctive cusp repair seems to affect the mid-term reoperation risk in patients with BAV and not in patients with tricuspid aortic valve. We recommend caution in using this technique in case of asymmetric BAV requiring cusp repair.
Full Text via ClinicalKey