Clinical outcomes of single‐site laparoscopic interval appendectomy for severe complicated appendicitis: Comparison to conventional emergency appendectomy
| العنوان: | Clinical outcomes of single‐site laparoscopic interval appendectomy for severe complicated appendicitis: Comparison to conventional emergency appendectomy |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Toshiya Michiura, Nobuyasu Hayashi, Satoshi Hyuga, Kazuo Yamabe, Shoichiro Urabe, Tomo Nakagawa, Masaaki Miyo |
| المصدر: | Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery, Vol 3, Iss 5, Pp 561-567 (2019) |
| بيانات النشر: | John Wiley and Sons Inc., 2019. |
| سنة النشر: | 2019 |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: | emergency appendectomy, medicine.medical_specialty, RD1-811, conservative treatment, RC799-869, Single site, medicine, Emergency appendectomy, Abscess, business.industry, interval appendectomy, Gastroenterology, Complicated appendicitis, Perioperative, Original Articles, Diseases of the digestive system. Gastroenterology, medicine.disease, Appendicitis, Surgery, Conservative treatment, complicated appendicitis, Original Article, Laparoscopic interval appendectomy, single‐site laparoscopic appendectomy, business |
| الوصف: | Aim Single‐site laparoscopic interval appendectomy (SLIA) for severe complicated appendicitis after conservative treatment (CT) to ameliorate inflammation and eradicate the abscess should be safer and less invasive than emergency appendectomy (EA). However, only a few reports have been published regarding SLIA. Methods We retrospectively collected data on 264 consecutive patients admitted to Kinan Hospital for treatment of appendicitis between 2012 and 2018. The safety and feasibility of SLIA and its perioperative outcomes for severe complicated appendicitis were investigated. Results A total of 61 patients were included in this study, 25 of whom underwent CT and 36 EA. Among the 25 patients who underwent CT, 23 (92.0%) succeeded; a total of 16 patients (69.5%) underwent SLIA. Compared to the EA group, the SLIA group had less bleeding (median volume 8.5 vs 50 mL, P = .005) and lower rate of expansion surgery (0% vs 27.8%, P = .022). Although the postoperative hospital stay was shorter in the SLIA group than in the EA group (9 vs 12 days, P = .008), the total hospital stay, including the CT period, was longer in the SLIA group than in the EA group (24 vs 12 days, P |
| اللغة: | English |
| تدمد: | 2475-0328 |
| URL الوصول: | https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::0766dada0f2585df4bf40e1cae8bb205 http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6750141 |
| حقوق: | OPEN |
| رقم الأكسشن: | edsair.doi.dedup.....0766dada0f2585df4bf40e1cae8bb205 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | OpenAIRE |
| تدمد: | 24750328 |
|---|