Perceptions of interdisciplinary rounding practices
| العنوان: | Perceptions of interdisciplinary rounding practices |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Kenneth R. White, Genevieve Beaird, Marianne Baernholdt |
| المصدر: | Journal of Clinical Nursing. 29:1141-1150 |
| بيانات النشر: | Wiley, 2020. |
| سنة النشر: | 2020 |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: | Adult, Male, Interprofessional Relations, Interpersonal communication, Unit (housing), 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, Patient-Centered Care, Intervention (counseling), Humans, Relevance (law), 030212 general & internal medicine, Cooperative Behavior, Qualitative Research, General Nursing, Patient Care Team, Medical education, 030504 nursing, Perspective (graphical), General Medicine, Checklist, Leadership, Content analysis, Female, 0305 other medical science, Psychology, Qualitative research |
| الوصف: | Aims and objectives To explore practitioner perspectives on the facilitators, barriers and outcomes associated with interdisciplinary rounding practices (IDR). Background Interdisciplinary rounding practices is frequently used intervention to promote collaboration and patient-centred care in hospital units. Previous research supports that having IDR in place can lead to greater perceptions of collaboration and practitioner satisfaction; however, the practice does not always lead to better outcomes for patients. For IDR to be successful, unit leadership needs a greater understanding of facilitators and barriers as perceived by team members. At both the individual and organisational levels, there is limited understanding on what influences the success of IDR. This study seeks to explore factors influencing interdisciplinary rounding and perceived outcomes by team members. Design A quasi-qualitative design was used to address the aim of this study. Four open-ended questions were emailed to practitioners across fifteen units in two academic health centres. All units identified as having IDR in place. Methods A directed content analysis of practitioner responses was used to identify key themes. The Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research checklist was consulted for reporting of the results. Results A total of 141 practitioners responded to the open-ended questions. Three themes emerged from the data: (a) setting the stage; (b) the work of the team; and 3) benefits to patient care. Conclusions The study provides a nuanced perspective of facilitators, barriers and potential outcomes associated with IDR. Future research is needed to gain additional perspective on the role the organisation plays in promoting a healthy workplace environment as well as providing patient-centred care. Relevance to clinical practice This study provides insight into facilitators and barriers to conducting interdisciplinary rounding practices in the inpatient setting. Results can be useful to unit leaders and staff that advocate for more collaborative and patient-centred rounding practices. |
| تدمد: | 1365-2702 0962-1067 |
| URL الوصول: | https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::106d34bb301a47892259608083f0e1c6 https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15161 |
| حقوق: | CLOSED |
| رقم الأكسشن: | edsair.doi.dedup.....106d34bb301a47892259608083f0e1c6 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | OpenAIRE |
| تدمد: | 13652702 09621067 |
|---|