Unpublished systematic reviews and financial support: a meta-epidemiological study

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Unpublished systematic reviews and financial support: a meta-epidemiological study
المؤلفون: Yasushi Tsujimoto, Yuki Kataoka, Hiraku Tsujimoto
المصدر: BMC Research Notes
BMC Research Notes, Vol 10, Iss 1, Pp 1-5 (2017)
بيانات النشر: BioMed Central, 2017.
سنة النشر: 2017
مصطلحات موضوعية: medicine.medical_specialty, Registry, lcsh:Medicine, PRISMA, Dissemination bias, Publication bias, General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, Epidemiology, medicine, Financial Support, 030212 general & internal medicine, lcsh:Science (General), lcsh:QH301-705.5, Meta-epidemiology, business.industry, Unpublished results, 030503 health policy & services, lcsh:R, Questionnaire, General Medicine, Odds ratio, Research Note, Epidemiologic Studies, Review Literature as Topic, Systematic review, lcsh:Biology (General), Median time, Family medicine, PROSPERO, 0305 other medical science, business, lcsh:Q1-390
الوصف: Objective PROSPERO, an international prospective register of systematic reviews, was launched in February 2011 to reduce publication bias of systematic reviews (SRs). A questionnaire survey of SR researchers conducted in 2005 indicated the existence of unpublished SRs and the potential influence of lack of funding as a reason for non-publication. Here, we investigated the publication status of registered SRs in the 1st year that PROSPERO launched and assessed the association between publication and the existence of funding or conflicts of interest (COIs). Results We identified 326 SRs registered in PROSPERO from February 2011 through February 2012. Among them, 85 SRs (26%) remained unpublished at least 65 months after registration. We found 241 published reports, including four conference abstracts and one poster presentation. Median time to publication from protocol registration was 16.3 months. Funding for SRs was associated with publication [odds ratio (OR) = 2.10; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.26 to 3.50]. We found no significant association of author-reported COIs with publication (OR = 2.35; 95% CI = 0.67 to 8.20). Twenty SRs were not published despite the authors reporting completion of the reviews in PROSPERO. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13104-017-3043-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
اللغة: English
تدمد: 1756-0500
URL الوصول: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::1f6bfead50885de0122f80f1c499b249
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5717810
حقوق: OPEN
رقم الأكسشن: edsair.doi.dedup.....1f6bfead50885de0122f80f1c499b249
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE