Willingness of pregnant women and clinicians to participate in a hypothetical randomised controlled trial comparing vaginal delivery and elective caesarean section
| العنوان: | Willingness of pregnant women and clinicians to participate in a hypothetical randomised controlled trial comparing vaginal delivery and elective caesarean section |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Jane M. Young, C. E. Turner, Hala Phipps, Christopher Benness, Michael J. Solomon, J. Ludlow |
| المصدر: | Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 48:542-546 |
| بيانات النشر: | Wiley, 2008. |
| سنة النشر: | 2008 |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: | Adult, Male, medicine.medical_specialty, Attitude of Health Personnel, Nurse Midwives, law.invention, Randomized controlled trial, Pregnancy, law, Surveys and Questionnaires, medicine, Humans, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Gynecology, Cesarean Section, Vaginal delivery, Obstetrics, business.industry, Australia, Obstetrics and Gynecology, General Medicine, Middle Aged, Delivery, Obstetric, medicine.disease, Colorectal surgery, Confidence interval, Elective Surgical Procedures, Gestation, Female, Pregnant Women, Elective caesarean section, business, Attitude to Health, Colorectal Surgery, Colorectal surgeons |
| الوصف: | Background: Elective caesarean section is controversial in the absence of compelling evidence of the relative benefits and harms compared with vaginal delivery. A randomised trial of the two procedures to compare outcomes for women and babies would provide the best quality scientific evidence to confirm this debate but it is not known whether such a trial would be feasible. Aims: To ascertain the proportion of primiparas and clinicians who would participate in a hypothetical randomised controlled trial comparing vaginal delivery with elective caesarean section. Methods: Pregnant women (mean 22 weeks gestation) recruited from public and private antenatal clinics at a major tertiary referral centre were interviewed to ascertain their willingness to participate in a hypothetical randomised controlled trial. A self-administered questionnaire was mailed to midwives, obstetricians, urogynaecologists and colorectal surgeons, and results between groups were compared. Results: One hundred pregnant women, 84 midwives, 166 obstetricians, 12 urogynaecologists and 87 colorectal surgeons participated. Only 14% (95% confidence interval (CI), 8–22) of pregnant women and 31% (95% CI, 26–36) of clinicians indicated that they would participate in a randomised controlled trial. Conclusions: A randomised controlled trial comparing vaginal delivery and elective caesarean section may not be feasible due to low levels of willingness to participate, particularly among pregnant women. |
| تدمد: | 1479-828X 0004-8666 |
| URL الوصول: | https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::2d4c34f2e3f1c6d20f906137fa927dcf https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1479-828x.2008.00923.x |
| حقوق: | CLOSED |
| رقم الأكسشن: | edsair.doi.dedup.....2d4c34f2e3f1c6d20f906137fa927dcf |
| قاعدة البيانات: | OpenAIRE |
| تدمد: | 1479828X 00048666 |
|---|