Incidence of Middle Mesial Canals Based on Distance between Mesial Canal Orifices in Mandibular Molars: A Clinical and Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Analysis

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Incidence of Middle Mesial Canals Based on Distance between Mesial Canal Orifices in Mandibular Molars: A Clinical and Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Analysis
المؤلفون: Alejandro E Pereda, Sonam Khurana, Carla Y. Falcon, Priti P Lotlikar, Craig Hirschberg, Eric M Weinberg
المصدر: Journal of Endodontics. 46:40-43
بيانات النشر: Elsevier BV, 2020.
سنة النشر: 2020
مصطلحات موضوعية: 0301 basic medicine, Orthodontics, Molar, Cone beam computed tomography, business.industry, Incidence, digestive, oral, and skin physiology, Significant difference, Mandible, 030206 dentistry, Cone-Beam Computed Tomography, Computed tomographic, stomatognathic diseases, 03 medical and health sciences, 030104 developmental biology, 0302 clinical medicine, stomatognathic system, parasitic diseases, Humans, Medicine, Dental Pulp Cavity, Tooth Root, business, General Dentistry
الوصف: Introduction This study evaluated the presence of midmesial canals (MMCs) in a random sample of mandibular molars and the relationship of the intracanal distance between mesiobuccal (MB) and mesiolingual (ML) canal orifices. Methods Fifty-one extracted mandibular molars were divided into samples of 3 to 4 teeth, mounted in plaster and boxing wax, and immersed in water before cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT) imaging. Two endodontic residents completed the access openings. The teeth and the CBCT images were interpreted for the presence of MMCs and the mesial intracanal distance. CBCT software measured the distance between the buccal of the MB canal to the lingual of the ML canal at the pulpal floor to determine the average length between the canals. Results Seven distinct MMCs were seen both clinically (incidence of 13.725%) and on the CBCT images. Twenty-seven teeth (52.94%) had ambiguous broad isthmi between the MB and the ML orifices. MMCs were present at the furcation level but merged with the MB or ML canal toward the apex in 6 of 7 teeth (85.71%). The mean distance between the mesial canals in teeth with MMCs was 3.643 mm, and it was 3.818 mm for teeth without MMCs. According to independent sample t testing, the P value was >.05. Conclusions The incidence of MMCs in mandibular molars appears consistent with the literature. However, there does not appear to be a statistically significant difference in the mesial intracanal distance in teeth with and without MMCs. Visualization of MMCs on CBCTs may be subjective. There does not appear to be a correlation between the presence of MMCs and an increased or decreased mesial intracanal distance.
تدمد: 0099-2399
URL الوصول: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::3d54354aabd9dc0ee18155be01960aae
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2019.10.017
حقوق: CLOSED
رقم الأكسشن: edsair.doi.dedup.....3d54354aabd9dc0ee18155be01960aae
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE