Application of the Micro Biological Survey analytical method for the determination of bacterial load in cow raw milk
| العنوان: | Application of the Micro Biological Survey analytical method for the determination of bacterial load in cow raw milk |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Nicla Marri, Alyexandra Arienzo, Simonetta Amatiste, Giovanni Antonini, Elga Ersilia Tieri, Loris Leboffe, Francesca Losito, Cristina Marfoglia, Violeta Di Marzio, Nicola D'Alterio, Lorenza Murgia, Alessandra Cornacchia, Romolo Salini, Maria Antonietta Saletti, Francesco Pomilio |
| المصدر: | Italian Journal of Food Safety Italian Journal of Food Safety, Vol 9, Iss 3 (2020) |
| بيانات النشر: | PAGEPress Publications, 2020. |
| سنة النشر: | 2020 |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: | animal structures, Chromatography, lcsh:TP368-456, Cow raw milk, Plate count at 30°C (CFU/mL), 010401 analytical chemistry, 04 agricultural and veterinary sciences, Gold standard (test), Raw milk, 040401 food science, 01 natural sciences, Article, 0104 chemical sciences, lcsh:Food processing and manufacture, Bactoscan FC, 0404 agricultural biotechnology, Plate count, Enumeration, Flow citometry, Plate count at 30°C (per ml), MBS test, Food Science, Mathematics |
| الوصف: | The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of “Micro Biological Survey – MBS Test” in the enumeration of bacterial load in cow raw milk. The MBS test is based on a colorimetric method recently developed and patented by “Roma Tre” University, Italy. The evaluation of the performance of the MBS method was carried out by comparison with plate count at 30°C (gold standard) and flow cytometry. Thirteen independent set of experiments were performed analyzing a total of 104 samples of cow raw milk with the selected methods. Results obtained using the MBS method are comparable with those obtained with the plate count method at 30°C (CFU/mL) and flow cytometry technology; in particular, the results obtained with the MBS method are very close to plate count’s at 30°C. On the other hand, there are statistically significant differences between these two methods’ and flow cytometry technology’s results that could be due to the different experimental conditions. |
| تدمد: | 2239-7132 |
| URL الوصول: | https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::430839432fa6b1858f4a7e3538075f3a https://doi.org/10.4081/ijfs.2020.7696 |
| حقوق: | OPEN |
| رقم الأكسشن: | edsair.doi.dedup.....430839432fa6b1858f4a7e3538075f3a |
| قاعدة البيانات: | OpenAIRE |
| تدمد: | 22397132 |
|---|