HYC-24L Demonstrates Greater Effectiveness With Less Pain Than CPM-22.5 for Treatment of Perioral Lines in a Randomized Controlled Trial

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: HYC-24L Demonstrates Greater Effectiveness With Less Pain Than CPM-22.5 for Treatment of Perioral Lines in a Randomized Controlled Trial
المؤلفون: Kimberly Butterwick, Ellen S. Marmur, Julia Kolodziejczyk, Sue Ellen Cox, Neil S. Sadick, John H Joseph, Vic A. Narurkar, Ruth Tedaldi, Sarah Wheeler, Conor J. Gallagher
المصدر: Dermatologic Surgery. 41:1351-1360
بيانات النشر: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), 2015.
سنة النشر: 2015
مصطلحات موضوعية: Male, Esthetics, Lidocaine, Contusions, Injections, Subcutaneous, Pain, Cosmetic Techniques, Dermatology, law.invention, Randomized controlled trial, law, Dermal Fillers, Clinical endpoint, Humans, Medicine, Hyaluronic Acid, Adverse effect, business.industry, Mean age, General Medicine, Middle Aged, Skin Aging, Multicenter study, Face, Anesthesia, Belotero balance, Female, Surgery, Juvederm Ultra, business, medicine.drug
الوصف: OBJECTIVE This trial compares the effectiveness and safety of HYC-24L (Juvederm Ultra XC; Allergan plc, Dublin, Ireland) (24 mg/mL of hyaluronic acid, 0.3% lidocaine) and CPM-22.5 (Belotero Balance; Merz Aesthetics, Raleigh, NC) (22.5 mg/mL of hyaluronic acid) for the treatment of perioral lines. MATERIALS AND METHODS Men and women aged 35 years or older with moderate-to-severe perioral lines were recruited for this randomized controlled, rater-blinded, 2-arm trial. The primary endpoint was a comparison of rater-assessed responder rates by the validated 4-point Perioral Lines Severity Scale at Month 6; responders were those who showed a ≥1 point improvement. A secondary endpoint was subject-assessed change in perioral lines measured by the Global Assessment of Change Scale. RESULTS A total of 136 subjects received treatment and 132 completed the trial (mean age: 58 ± 8 years). Total volume injected was 1.18 mL (HYC-24L) and 1.32 mL (CPM-22.5). At Month 6, a significantly greater proportion of HYC-24L subjects responded to treatment (87%) than CPM-22.5 subjects (72%) (p < .04). At all time points, HYC-24L subjects reported significantly greater improvement in their perioral lines than CPM-22.5 subjects, with the greatest difference at Month 6. No unexpected adverse events occurred. CONCLUSION HYC-24L subjects showed a higher response rate and a greater improvement in their perioral lines than CPM-22.5 subjects for up to 6 months.
تدمد: 1076-0512
URL الوصول: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::467d7d8cd3f1765a02ebe3de0d851155
https://doi.org/10.1097/dss.0000000000000576
رقم الأكسشن: edsair.doi.dedup.....467d7d8cd3f1765a02ebe3de0d851155
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE