Respiratory Variation in Carotid Artery Peak Systolic Velocity Is Unable to Predict Fluid Responsiveness in Spontaneously Breathing Critically Ill Patients When Assessed by Novice Physician Sonologists

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Respiratory Variation in Carotid Artery Peak Systolic Velocity Is Unable to Predict Fluid Responsiveness in Spontaneously Breathing Critically Ill Patients When Assessed by Novice Physician Sonologists
المؤلفون: Adeel Abbasi, Nader Azab, Alexandra Schick, Roland C. Merchant, Keith Corl, Mohammed Nayeemuddin, Michael Blaivas, Mitchell M. Levy, Gary Phillips, Thomas Lopardo
المصدر: Journal of Intensive Care Medicine. 36:885-892
بيانات النشر: SAGE Publications, 2020.
سنة النشر: 2020
مصطلحات موضوعية: Carotid ultrasound, medicine.medical_specialty, business.industry, Critically ill, Critical Illness, Respiration, Carotid arteries, Point of care ultrasound, Fluid responsiveness, Ultrasound, Hemodynamics, Stroke Volume, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Respiration, Artificial, Carotid Arteries, Physicians, Internal medicine, Breathing, Cardiology, Fluid Therapy, Humans, Medicine, Respiratory system, business
الوصف: Background: Respiratory variation in carotid artery peak systolic velocity (ΔVpeak) assessed by point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has been proposed as a noninvasive means to predict fluid responsiveness. We aimed to evaluate the ability of carotid ΔVpeak as assessed by novice physician sonologists to predict fluid responsiveness. Methods: This study was conducted in 2 intensive care units. Spontaneously breathing, nonintubated patients with signs of volume depletion were included. Patients with atrial fibrillation/flutter, cardiogenic, obstructive or neurogenic shock, or those for whom further intravenous (IV) fluid administration would be harmful were excluded. Three novice physician sonologists were trained in POCUS assessment of carotid ΔVpeak. They assessed the carotid ΔVpeak in study participants prior to the administration of a 500 mL IV fluid bolus. Fluid responsiveness was defined as a ≥10% increase in cardiac index as measured using bioreactance. Results: Eighty-six participants were enrolled, 50 (58.1%) were fluid responders. Carotid ΔVpeak performed poorly at predicting fluid responsiveness. Test characteristics for the optimum carotid ΔVpeak of 8.0% were: area under the receiver operating curve = 0.61 (95% CI: 0.48-0.73), sensitivity = 72.0% (95% CI: 58.3-82.56), specificity = 50.0% (95% CI: 34.5-65.5). Conclusions: Novice physician sonologists using POCUS are unable to predict fluid responsiveness using carotid ΔVpeak. Until further research identifies key limiting factors, clinicians should use caution directing IV fluid resuscitation using carotid ΔVpeak.
تدمد: 1525-1489
0885-0666
URL الوصول: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::472c641a45ab95f08ac81933e76ad86d
https://doi.org/10.1177/0885066620934392
حقوق: CLOSED
رقم الأكسشن: edsair.doi.dedup.....472c641a45ab95f08ac81933e76ad86d
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE