Design science and co-designing of hybrid workplaces
| العنوان: | Design science and co-designing of hybrid workplaces |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Marko Lahti, Suvi Nenonen |
| المساهمون: | Tampere University, Civil Engineering |
| المصدر: | Buildings, Vol 11, Iss 129, p 129 (2021) Buildings; Volume 11; Issue 3; Pages: 129 |
| سنة النشر: | 2021 |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: | 212 Civil and construction engineering, Computer science, hybrid working environment, Context (language use), 0102 computer and information sciences, Design science, 01 natural sciences, lcsh:TH1-9745, Case method, Architecture, Information system, usability briefing, Project management, Civil and Structural Engineering, action design research, business.industry, 05 social sciences, 050301 education, entry point analysis, project management, co-design, co-working, Usability, Building and Construction, Entry Point Analysis, Data science, Identification (information), 010201 computation theory & mathematics, Design science research, business, 0503 education, lcsh:Building construction |
| الوصف: | Background: Future places for learning and working are digitally and physically integrated hybrid environments. The archetypical context of learning is the classroom, and context of working is the office; especially in knowledge work. New information and communication technologies enable the spatial reconfiguration of work opening possibilities for work to take place across multiple locations. This paper aims to explore how the conceptual framework of design-science research in Information Systems can be applied when the design object is a hybrid working environment.; Methods: The case study method as a qualitative approach was chosen; because it involves an empirical investigation of a particular contemporary phenomenon within its real life context using multiple sources of evidence. The empirical analysis of two hybrid working environments is based on Action Design Research (ADR)-entry points; where one analyzes two case studies stage by stage. By analyzing various stages in both case studies; one can identify co-designing challenges of hybrid working environments. Results: The results present four recommendations for co-designing of hybrid working environments. The use of hybrid working environment; the design of spatial solution; the identification of iterative processes; and the user experiences of presence and distance are significant. The Entry Point Analysis-tool can be used and further developed in analyzing and developing hybrid working environments. Conclusion: The results contribute to the tradition of usability studies. The usability briefing approach can be further developed by identifying the iterative processes inside the linear project management models. Additionally, design science research can find new insights from identification of the large stakeholder iterations more precisely. publishedVersion |
| وصف الملف: | fulltext; application/pdf |
| اللغة: | English |
| URL الوصول: | https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::4c65719a1fae9f7cecc5a8386ddc752d https://trepo.tuni.fi/handle/10024/133074 |
| حقوق: | OPEN |
| رقم الأكسشن: | edsair.doi.dedup.....4c65719a1fae9f7cecc5a8386ddc752d |
| قاعدة البيانات: | OpenAIRE |
| الوصف غير متاح. |