Prevalence and correlates of patient-centred preparatory information provision to computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging outpatients: A cross-sectional study

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Prevalence and correlates of patient-centred preparatory information provision to computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging outpatients: A cross-sectional study
المؤلفون: Rob Sanson-Fisher, Lisa Hyde, Lisa Mackenzie, Allison Boyes, Tiffany-Jane Evans, Michael E. Symonds
المصدر: Patient Education and Counseling. 101:1814-1822
بيانات النشر: Elsevier BV, 2018.
سنة النشر: 2018
مصطلحات موضوعية: Male, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, medicine.medical_specialty, Cross-sectional study, Patient characteristics, Guidelines as Topic, Computed tomography, 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, Patient Education as Topic, Patient-Centered Care, Surveys and Questionnaires, Outpatients, Prevalence, medicine, Medical imaging, Humans, 030212 general & internal medicine, Information provision, Aged, medicine.diagnostic_test, business.industry, Patient Preference, Magnetic resonance imaging, General Medicine, Middle Aged, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cross-Sectional Studies, 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis, Family medicine, Public hospital, Female, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, business, Patient centred
الوصف: Objective Responsiveness to information preferences is key to high-quality, patient-centred care. This study examined the top ten preparatory information items not delivered in accordance with medical imaging outpatients’ preferences, and patient characteristics associated with reporting a greater number of unmet information preferences. Methods Magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography outpatients were recruited consecutively in one major public hospital waiting room. Participants self-administered a touchscreen computer questionnaire assessing their sociodemographic and scan characteristics, and unmet preferences for 33 guideline-endorsed preparatory information items. Results Of 317 eligible patients, 280 (88%) consented to participate. Given equal rankings, the top ten unmet information preferences included 13 items which were endorsed by at least 25% of participants, and commonly related to receiving ‘too little’ information. One item related to the pre-scan period, seven items to the scan period and five items to the post-scan period. None of the patient characteristics examined were significantly associated with reporting a greater number of unmet information preferences. Conclusion There is room to improve responsiveness to medical imaging outpatients’ preparatory information preferences. Improvements should be targeted at individuals, rather than groups defined by sociodemographic or scan characteristics. Practice Implications A standardised approach to addressing individual patient’s information preferences is needed.
تدمد: 0738-3991
URL الوصول: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::51da5cf0622a1facd773a9b884aec33f
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2018.05.025
حقوق: CLOSED
رقم الأكسشن: edsair.doi.dedup.....51da5cf0622a1facd773a9b884aec33f
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE