Hysteropexy in the treatment of uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: a multicenter randomized controlled non-inferiority trial comparing laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy with vaginal sacrospinous hysteropexy (LAVA-trial, study protocol)

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Hysteropexy in the treatment of uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: a multicenter randomized controlled non-inferiority trial comparing laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy with vaginal sacrospinous hysteropexy (LAVA-trial, study protocol)
المؤلفون: Jan den Boon, Anne-Lotte W. M. Coolen, Geerte van de Pol, Hugo W F van Eijndhoven, Celine Radder, Mèlanie N van IJsselmuiden, Renée J. Detollenaere, Marlies Y. Bongers, Jan Deprest, Astrid Vollebregt
المصدر: BMC Women's Health
بيانات النشر: BioMed Central, 2014.
سنة النشر: 2014
مصطلحات موضوعية: medicine.medical_specialty, Uterine descent, Reproductive medicine, Severity of Illness Index, law.invention, Study Protocol, Patient satisfaction, Gynecologic Surgical Procedures, Quality of life, Randomized controlled trial, law, Uterine Prolapse, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Severity of illness, medicine, Humans, Stage (cooking), Netherlands, Medicine(all), Vaginal sacrospinous hysteropexy, Ligaments, business.industry, Laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy, Uterus, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Uterine prolapse, General Medicine, Sacrohysteropexy, medicine.disease, Hysteropexy, Surgery, Pelvic organ prolapse, Treatment Outcome, Reproductive Medicine, Vagina, Quality of Life, Female, Laparoscopy, business
الوصف: Background Pelvic organ prolapse is a common health problem: the lifetime risk of undergoing surgery for pelvic organ prolapse by the age of 85 years is 19%. Pelvic organ prolapse has significant negative effects on a woman’s quality of life. Worldwide, vaginal hysterectomy is the leading treatment method for patients with symptomatic uterovaginal prolapse. Several studies have shown that vaginal sacrospinous hysteropexy and laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy are safe and effective alternatives in treating uterine descent. To date, it is unclear which of these techniques leads to the best operative result and the highest patient satisfaction. Therefore, we conducted the LAVA trial. Methods The LAVA trial is a randomized controlled multicenter non-inferiority trial. The study compares laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy with vaginal sacrospinous hysteropexy in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher. The primary outcome of this study is surgical success of the apical compartment at 1 and 5 years follow-up. Secondary outcomes are subjective improvement on urogenital symptoms and quality of life (assessed by disease-specific and general quality of life questionnaires), complications following surgery, hospital stay, post-operative recovery, sexual functioning and costs-effectiveness. Evaluation will take place pre-operatively, and 6 weeks, 6 months, 12 months and annually till 60 months after surgery. Validated questionnaires will be used. Analysis will be performed according to the intention to treat principle. Based on comparable recurrence rates of 3% and a non-inferiority margin of 10%, 62 patients are needed in each arm to prove the hypothesis with a 95% confidence interval. Discussion The LAVA trial is a randomized controlled multicenter non-inferiority trial that will provide evidence whether the efficacy of laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy is non-inferior to vaginal sacrospinous hysteropexy in women with symptomatic uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher. Trial registration Netherlands Trial Register (NTR): NTR4029
اللغة: English
تدمد: 1472-6874
URL الوصول: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::51ec3a3e2001843f06eefa05059e05e8
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4254385
حقوق: OPEN
رقم الأكسشن: edsair.doi.dedup.....51ec3a3e2001843f06eefa05059e05e8
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE