Does being exposed to an educational tool influence patient preferences? The influence of an educational tool on patient preferences assessed by a discrete choice experiment

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Does being exposed to an educational tool influence patient preferences? The influence of an educational tool on patient preferences assessed by a discrete choice experiment
المؤلفون: Karim Raza, Jorien Veldwijk, Eva Baecklund, Mats G. Hansson, Ulrik Kihlbom, Marie Falahee, Karin Schölin Bywall
المساهمون: Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management
المصدر: Patient Education and Counseling
Patient Education and Counseling, 104(10), 2577-2585. Elsevier Ireland Ltd
سنة النشر: 2021
مصطلحات موضوعية: Medical education, 030503 health policy & services, Authorization, Discrete choice experiment, Patient Preference, General Medicine, Pictogram, Patient preference, Choice Behavior, Arthritis, Rheumatoid, 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, Antirheumatic Agents, Educational Status, Humans, In patient, 030212 general & internal medicine, Risks and benefits, Icon, 0305 other medical science, Association (psychology), Psychology, computer, computer.programming_language
الوصف: Objectives There is an increased interest in patient preferences informing the development and authorisation of medical products. A requirement for robust and meaningful results of such studies is that patients adequately understand the risks and benefits associated with treatments for which their preferences are elicited. This study aims to determine the influence of an educational tool, compared with traditional written information on patient preferences elicited in a discrete choice experiment (DCE). Methods Treatment preferences of Swedish patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) were assessed using a DCE. Patients were recruited via clinics, a research panel, and the Swedish Rheumatism Association. Respondents received training materials either as plain written text or as an online educational tool. The educational tool was designed to enhance understanding of the written text by using graphics, pictograms, icon arrays, spoken text, and click-on functions. Data were analysed using random parameter logit models. Results 675 patients with RA were included in the analysis. The patients received either a written information (n = 358) or information via an educational tool (n = 317). Respondents receiving the educational tool placed relatively more importance on all included side effects in their decision making, compared to respondents receiving the written text, who placed greater importance on treatment effectiveness and administration methods. Conclusion Compared to the respondents receiving the written text, the decisions of respondents receiving the educational tool were more influenced by medication side effects. Further research is needed to provide guidance on how and when to use educational tools to inform and elicit patients’ preferences. Practice implications The ways in which attributes are presented to patients significantly impacts preferences measured in a DCE.
تدمد: 0738-3991
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.03.013
URL الوصول: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::51f894a6cc2778250f59e41c8cd5a689
حقوق: CLOSED
رقم الأكسشن: edsair.doi.dedup.....51f894a6cc2778250f59e41c8cd5a689
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE
الوصف
تدمد:07383991
DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2021.03.013