Comparative Effectiveness of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Early-Stage Breast Cancer: A Network Meta-analysis

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Comparative Effectiveness of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Early-Stage Breast Cancer: A Network Meta-analysis
المؤلفون: Rachel J. Buchsbaum, Abhigna Kodali, Preethi John, Raveendhara R. Bannuru, John K. Erban, Mikala C. Osani
المصدر: Clinical Breast Cancer. 21:e22-e37
بيانات النشر: Elsevier BV, 2021.
سنة النشر: 2021
مصطلحات موضوعية: 0301 basic medicine, Oncology, Cancer Research, medicine.medical_specialty, Network Meta-Analysis, Breast Neoplasms, Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms, Disease-Free Survival, law.invention, 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, Breast cancer, Randomized controlled trial, law, Internal medicine, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, medicine, Adjuvant therapy, Humans, Neoplasm Staging, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, business.industry, Odds ratio, medicine.disease, Clinical trial, 030104 developmental biology, Systematic review, Chemotherapy, Adjuvant, 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis, Meta-analysis, Female, business, Febrile neutropenia
الوصف: Background There are several regimens recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) for HER2-negative operable breast cancer. To our knowledge, no trials have yet been performed comparing these regimens head to head. We performed a network meta-analysis comparing the efficacy of NCCN-recommended chemotherapy regimens. Methods We searched Medline, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform from inception to February 2020. We included randomized clinical trials comparing adjuvant regimens in predominantly node-positive operable breast cancer patients. We compared (1) DDACT, (2) TCx4 cycles, (3) TAC, and (4) ACWKT. Common comparators were (5) AC, (6) ACT, and (7) ACD. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. The Cochrane risk of bias tool assessed quality of the studies. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated as measures of treatment effects with AC as reference. We used Bayesian hierarchical random-effects models with noninformative priors for mixed multiple treatment comparisons. Effectiveness was estimated by disease-free and overall survival using ORs. Sensitivity analyses were performed. Safety outcomes included febrile neutropenia. Results We identified 7 randomized controlled trials with 16,332 patients. TC (odds ratio [95% confidence interval], 0.71 [0.36-1.40]), TAC (0.77 [0.37-1.57]), ACWKT (0.68 [0.34-1.38]), and DDACT (0.72 [0.35-1.42]) were similar for overall survival. TC (0.64 [0.36-1.14]), TAC (0.67 [0.39-1.15]), ACWKT (0.63 [0.37-1.07]), and DDACT (0.59 [0.35-1.01]) had similar disease-free survival benefit. With regard to toxicity, TAC (2.67 [0.30-21.04]) had the highest odds of febrile neutropenia. Conclusion The current generation of regimens are similar in efficacy. Given the lower toxicity of TCx4 comparatively, it is an acceptable alternative for lower-risk early-stage HER2-negative breast cancers.
تدمد: 1526-8209
URL الوصول: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::5494dd193d41805565a45fe9bc75b4ad
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2020.07.005
حقوق: CLOSED
رقم الأكسشن: edsair.doi.dedup.....5494dd193d41805565a45fe9bc75b4ad
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE