A survey of retracted articles in dentistry
| العنوان: | A survey of retracted articles in dentistry |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Túlio Eduardo Nogueira, Luciane Rezende Costa, Cláudio Rodrigues Leles, Andréia Souza Gonçalves, Aline Carvalho Batista |
| المصدر: | BMC Research Notes BMC Research Notes, Vol 10, Iss 1, Pp 1-8 (2017) |
| بيانات النشر: | Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2017. |
| سنة النشر: | 2017 |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: | Biomedical Research, lcsh:Medicine, Dentistry, Scientific literature, Duplicate publication, Plagiarism, General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, Retraction of Publication as Topic, 03 medical and health sciences, Misconduct, Retracted articles, 0302 clinical medicine, SCImago Journal Rank, Malpractice, Humans, Medicine, Retracted publication, 030212 general & internal medicine, lcsh:Science (General), lcsh:QH301-705.5, Scientific misconduct, Ethics, business.industry, lcsh:R, 030206 dentistry, General Medicine, Bioethics, Scientific frauds, Databases, Bibliographic, lcsh:Biology (General), Retraction of publication, Periodicals as Topic, business, Retracted Publication, lcsh:Q1-390, Research Article |
| الوصف: | Background Publication retraction is a mechanism to preserve the scientific literature against publications that contain seriously flawed or erroneous data, redundant publication, plagiarism, unethical research, and other features that compromise the integrity of science. An increase in the occurrence of retractions in recent years has been reported. Nevertheless, there is scarce information on this topic concerning publications in dentistry and related specialties. Thus, this study aimed to investigate retracted papers published in dental journals. Methods Data collection included an exploratory search in PubMed and a specific search in SCImago Journal Rank indexed journals, complemented by the cases reported on the Retraction Watch website and in PubMed. All 167 dental journals included in SCImago were searched for identification of retracted articles up to March 2016. The selected retracted articles and their corresponding retraction notices were recorded and assessed for classification according to the reason for retraction and other additional information. Results Forty of the 167 journals scrutinised at SCImago (23.9%) had at least one retracted article, and four additional journals were identified from the Retraction Watch website. A total of 72 retracted found were retracted for the reasons: redundant publication (20.8%), plagiarism (18.1%), misconduct (13.8%), overlap (13.6%) and honest error (9.7%). Higher number of retractions were reported in those journals with cites/doc |
| تدمد: | 1756-0500 |
| URL الوصول: | https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::58109675356b8b8a7bd31fc230d948bf https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-017-2576-y |
| حقوق: | OPEN |
| رقم الأكسشن: | edsair.doi.dedup.....58109675356b8b8a7bd31fc230d948bf |
| قاعدة البيانات: | OpenAIRE |
Find this article in full text from Springer Verlag. | تدمد: | 17560500 |
|---|