Amlodipine and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor combination versus amlodipine monotherapy in hypertension: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Amlodipine and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor combination versus amlodipine monotherapy in hypertension: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
المؤلفون: Jing Zhong, Guan-min Chen, Wei-Wu Fang, Yan Lv, Zui Zou, Huai-Xin Jia
المصدر: Blood pressure monitoring. 15(4)
سنة النشر: 2010
مصطلحات موضوعية: Male, medicine.medical_specialty, Combination therapy, Urology, Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors, Assessment and Diagnosis, Sensitivity and Specificity, law.invention, Randomized controlled trial, law, Internal medicine, Internal Medicine, medicine, Humans, Amlodipine, Adverse effect, Antihypertensive Agents, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Advanced and Specialized Nursing, biology, business.industry, Angiotensin-converting enzyme, General Medicine, Middle Aged, Calcium Channel Blockers, Blood pressure, Endocrinology, Treatment Outcome, Tolerability, Relative risk, Hypertension, biology.protein, Drug Therapy, Combination, Female, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, business, medicine.drug
الوصف: OBJECTIVE This study aimed to estimate the efficacy and tolerability of the combination of amlodipine and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors as compared with amlodipine monotherapy in the treatment of hypertension. METHODS The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, and Embase were searched for relevant articles. A random effect model of meta-analysis was used for the selected randomized controlled trials (RCTs). RESULTS A total of 17 randomized controlled trials involving 3291 patients were identified using predefined criteria. The combination treatment of amlodipine and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors resulted in a greater reduction of both systolic blood pressure (SBP) [weighted mean difference (WMD) 5.72, 95% CI: (confidence interval) 4.10-7.33] and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (WMD 3.62, 95% CI: 4.85-2.39) than monotherapy. The combination treatment also generated significantly greater reductions for the mean ambulatory SBP and DBP during the full 24 hours (WMD: SBP 4.24, 95% CI: 6.82-1.67; DBP 2.23, 95% CI: 3.73-0.69), but not for the trough (WMD: SBP 4.52, 9.56 to -0.51; DBP 3.7, 7.65 to -0.25). The hypertension therapeutic control (SPB
تدمد: 1473-5725
URL الوصول: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::5e9f0f8d454c65f91731467698e1fa64
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20512032
رقم الأكسشن: edsair.doi.dedup.....5e9f0f8d454c65f91731467698e1fa64
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE