Headache and migraine clinical practice guidelines: a systematic review and assessment of complementary and alternative medicine recommendations
| العنوان: | Headache and migraine clinical practice guidelines: a systematic review and assessment of complementary and alternative medicine recommendations |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Christina Hanna, Jeremy Y. Ng |
| المصدر: | BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, Vol 21, Iss 1, Pp 1-14 (2021) |
| سنة النشر: | 2020 |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: | Complementary Therapies, medicine.medical_specialty, animal structures, Migraine Disorders, Alternative medicine, MEDLINE, Context (language use), CINAHL, Other systems of medicine, medicine, Humans, Agree ii, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Migraine, Quality of Health Care, Clinical practice guideline, Adult patients, business.industry, Headache, AGREE II, medicine.disease, Clinical Practice, Complementary and alternative medicine, Family medicine, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Systematic review, business, human activities, RZ201-999, Research Article |
| الوصف: | Background Globally, 3 billion people suffer from either migraine or tension-type headache disorder over their lifetime. Approximately 50% of American adults suffering from headache or migraine have used complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), however, the quality and quantity of recommendations associated with such therapies across clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for the treatment and/or management of these conditions are unknown. The purpose of this study was to identify the quantity and assess the quality of such CAM recommendations. Methods MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL were systematically searched from 2009 to April 2020; the Guidelines International Network and the National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health websites were also searched for eligible CPGs. CPGs were included if they provided any therapy recommendations. Eligible CPGs included those written for adult patients with headache and migraine; CPGs containing CAM recommendations were assessed twice for quality using the AGREE II instrument, once for the overall CPG and once for the CAM sections. Results Of 486 unique search results, 21 CPGs were eligible and quality assessed; fifteen CPGs mentioned CAM, of which 13 CPGs made CAM recommendations. The overall CPG assessment yielded higher scaled domain percentages than the CAM section across all domains. The results from highest to lowest were as follows (overall, CAM): clarity of presentation (66.7% vs. 50.0%), scope and purpose (63.9% vs. 61.1%), stakeholder involvement (22.2% vs. 13.9%), rigour of development (13.5% vs. 9.4%), applicability (6.3% vs. 0.0%), and editorial independence (0.0% vs. 0.0%). Conclusions Of the eligible CPGs, the CAM sections were of lower quality compared to the overall recommendations across all domains of the AGREE II instrument. CPGs that scored well could serve as a framework for discussion between patients and healthcare professionals regarding use of CAM therapies in the context of headache and migraine. |
| تدمد: | 2662-7671 |
| URL الوصول: | https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::5f763e968372ed76b234745c180f35aa https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34551759 |
| حقوق: | OPEN |
| رقم الأكسشن: | edsair.doi.dedup.....5f763e968372ed76b234745c180f35aa |
| قاعدة البيانات: | OpenAIRE |
| تدمد: | 26627671 |
|---|