Mindfulness and acceptance‐based behavioral treatment for bulimia‐spectrum disorders: A pilot feasibility randomized trial
| العنوان: | Mindfulness and acceptance‐based behavioral treatment for bulimia‐spectrum disorders: A pilot feasibility randomized trial |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Emily K Presseller, Helen B. Murray, Rowan A. Hunt, Stephanie M. Manasse, Megan N. Parker, Adrienne S. Juarascio |
| المصدر: | Int J Eat Disord |
| بيانات النشر: | Wiley, 2021. |
| سنة النشر: | 2021 |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: | Adult, 050103 clinical psychology, medicine.medical_specialty, Mindfulness, Treatment outcome, Article, law.invention, 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, Quality of life, Randomized controlled trial, law, Humans, Medicine, 0501 psychology and cognitive sciences, Bulimia Nervosa, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Binge eating, business.industry, Bulimia nervosa, 05 social sciences, Behavioral treatment, medicine.disease, 030227 psychiatry, Psychiatry and Mental health, Eating disorders, Treatment Outcome, Quality of Life, Physical therapy, Feasibility Studies, medicine.symptom, business |
| الوصف: | Objective Although existing research supports the efficacy of mindfulness- and acceptance-based treatments (MABTs) for eating disorders (EDs), few studies have directly compared outcomes from MABTs to standard CBT. Method Participants (N = 44), treatment-seeking adults with bulimia-spectrum EDs, were screened for eligibility, consented, and randomized to receive 20 sessions of outpatient, individual CBT or MABT treatment. Treatment outcomes (binge eating and compensatory behavior episodes, global ED severity, depressive symptoms, quality of life, emotional awareness/clarity, distress tolerance, values-based decision-making, and emotion modulation) were measured at pre-treatment, post-treatment, and 6-month follow up. Data on feasibility and acceptability are also presented. Results Treatment and assessment retention rates were comparable between MABT and CBT (p range = .51-.73) and between-group differences on acceptability measures were very small (d range = 0.03-0.19). Both conditions produced notable and generally comparable changes in most treatment outcomes at post-treatment (within group d range = 0.06-1.77). Discussion The MABT and CBT conditions demonstrated comparable degrees of feasibility, acceptability, and symptom improvement, suggesting that MABTs warrant further evaluation as ED treatments. |
| تدمد: | 1098-108X 0276-3478 |
| URL الوصول: | https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::623e649d7b0eabaa30ec00d43bd90429 https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.23512 |
| حقوق: | OPEN |
| رقم الأكسشن: | edsair.doi.dedup.....623e649d7b0eabaa30ec00d43bd90429 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | OpenAIRE |
| تدمد: | 1098108X 02763478 |
|---|