Conservative management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma with endoscopic thulium laser ablation: A retrospective study with subgroup analyses

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Conservative management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma with endoscopic thulium laser ablation: A retrospective study with subgroup analyses
المؤلفون: Steven K. Huang, Chien-Liang Liu, Allen W. Chiu, Yu-Che Hsieh, Chia-Cheng Su, Jhih-Cheng Wang, I-Jung Feng
المصدر: Urological Science, Vol 31, Iss 6, Pp 258-266 (2020)
بيانات النشر: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2020.
سنة النشر: 2020
مصطلحات موضوعية: medicine.medical_specialty, Multivariate analysis, Proportional hazards model, business.industry, Urology, medicine.medical_treatment, Retrospective cohort study, Subgroup analysis, conservative treatment, kidney sparing surgery, Gold standard (test), Ablation, upper tract urothelial carcinoma, lcsh:Diseases of the genitourinary system. Urology, lcsh:RC870-923, thulium, laser therapy, Upper tract, Statistical significance, medicine, Radiology, business
الوصف: Purpose: The gold standard treatment for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is radical nephroureterectomy. The combination of ureterorenoscopy and laser ablation has recently become more accepted. This study aims at investigating the risk factors of tumor recurrence associated with the thulium laser ablation of UTUC and reporting its clinical outcomes with subgroup analyses. Materials and Methods: Patients who underwent endoscopic thulium laser ablation of UTUC as the primary treatment from June 2012 to November 2018 were reviewed retrospectively. Sixty-eight patients were enrolled, of whom 34 had complete data for analysis after applying the exclusion criteria. Bivariate analysis was performed to compare patients with and without recurrence. Multivariable Cox regression models were applied. Kaplan–Meier survival estimates were presented, and three tumor characteristics were used for subgroup analyses. Results: Fifteen patients (44%) had local tumor recurrence. Four patients (12%) had cancer-specific death. In bivariate analysis, statistical significance was noted for age, tumor grade, and tumor size (P = 0.018, 0.047, and 0.014, respectively). In multivariate analysis, statistical significance was noted for age and tumor size (P = 0.017 and 0.042, respectively). In the Kaplan–Meier estimates for subgroup analysis, statistical significance was noted only in the tumor size and tumor grade group (P = 0.0275). The study limitations included the retrospective design and small sample size. Conclusion: Tumor size and tumor grade are influential recurrence factors. The tumor stage did not show statistical significance in recurrence analysis. In subgroup analyses, tumor size was more influential than tumor grade with respect to the prognosis of local recurrence.
اللغة: English
تدمد: 1879-5226
URL الوصول: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::62eb58a25e6eddc6d9463392b0944b04
http://www.e-urol-sci.com/article.asp?issn=1879-5226;year=2020;volume=31;issue=6;spage=258;epage=266;aulast=Hsieh
حقوق: OPEN
رقم الأكسشن: edsair.doi.dedup.....62eb58a25e6eddc6d9463392b0944b04
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE