Five- Versus Ten-Fraction Regimens of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Primary and Metastatic NSCLC

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Five- Versus Ten-Fraction Regimens of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Primary and Metastatic NSCLC
المؤلفون: Michael Farris, Travis Jacobson, Michael H. Soike, Corbin A. Helis, Ryan T. Hughes, J.C. Farris, C. Steber
المصدر: Clin Lung Cancer
بيانات النشر: Elsevier BV, 2021.
سنة النشر: 2021
مصطلحات موضوعية: Male, 0301 basic medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Oncology, Cancer Research, medicine.medical_specialty, Lung Neoplasms, Stereotactic body radiation therapy, Adenocarcinoma of Lung, Radiosurgery, Article, 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Internal medicine, medicine, Humans, Fraction (mathematics), Cumulative incidence, Lung cancer, Aged, Retrospective Studies, Pneumonitis, business.industry, Hazard ratio, Prognosis, medicine.disease, Survival Rate, Regimen, 030104 developmental biology, Lymphatic Metastasis, 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis, Toxicity, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell, Female, Dose Fractionation, Radiation, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, business, Follow-Up Studies
الوصف: We retrospectively reviewed patients with early-stage and metastatic non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy using 2 fractionation regimens, 50 Gy in 5 fractions and 10 fractions. Local control was worse with the 10-fraction regimen but was not detrimental to progression-free or overall survival in patients with early NSCLC. Although suboptimal for local control, 50 Gy in 10 fractions could potentially be useful for reasonably durable control when dose-fractionation schemes with BED(10) ≥ 100 Gy are considered unsafe. INTRODUCTION: At our institution, stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has commonly been prescribed with 50 Gy in 5 fractions and in select cases, 50 Gy in 10 fractions. We sought to evaluate the impact of these 2 fractionation schedules on local control and survival outcomes. METHODS: We reviewed patients treated with SBRT with 50 Gy/5 fraction or 50 Gy/10 fraction for early-stage non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and metastatic NSCLC. Cumulative incidence of local failure (LF) was estimated using competing risk methodology. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method only for patients with stage I disease. RESULTS: Of the 353 lesions, 300 (85%) were treated with 50 Gy in 5 fractions and 53 (15%) with 10 fractions. LFs at 3 years were 6.5% and 23.9% and Kaplan-Meier estimate of median time to LF was 17.5 months and 26.2 months, respectively. Multivariable analysis revealed increasing planning target volume (hazard ratio 1.01, P = .04) as an independent predictor of increased LF, but tumor size, ultracentral location, and 10 fractions were not. Among patients with stage I NSCLC (n = 298), overall median PFS was 35.6 months and median OS was 42.4 months. There was no difference in PFS or OS between the 2 treatment regimens for patients with stage I NSCLC. Low rates of grade 3+ toxicity were observed, with 1 patient experiencing grade 3 pneumonitis after a 5-fraction regimen of SBRT. CONCLUSION: Dose-fractionation schemes with BED(10) ≥ 100 Gy provide superior local control and should be offered when meeting commonly accepted constraints. If those regimens appear unsafe, 50 Gy in 10 fractions may provide acceptable compromise between tumor control and safety with relatively durable control, and minimal negative impact on long-term survival.
تدمد: 1525-7304
URL الوصول: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::6423d7d37e35c313efeccf2b8f9c43cf
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cllc.2020.09.008
حقوق: OPEN
رقم الأكسشن: edsair.doi.dedup.....6423d7d37e35c313efeccf2b8f9c43cf
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE