Endoscopic hemostasis is rarely used for hematochezia: a population-based study from the Clinical Outcomes Research Initiative National Endoscopic Database

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Endoscopic hemostasis is rarely used for hematochezia: a population-based study from the Clinical Outcomes Research Initiative National Endoscopic Database
المؤلفون: Osnat Ron-Tal Fisher, J. Lucas Williams, Glenn M. Eisen, Jennifer L. Holub, Ian M. Gralnek
المصدر: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 79:317-325
بيانات النشر: Elsevier BV, 2014.
سنة النشر: 2014
مصطلحات موضوعية: Adult, Male, medicine.medical_specialty, Psychological intervention, Colonoscopy, computer.software_genre, Article, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, medicine, Humans, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging, Registries, Adverse effect, Aged, Retrospective Studies, Aged, 80 and over, medicine.diagnostic_test, Database, business.industry, Hemostasis, Endoscopic, Gastroenterology, Reproducibility of Results, Retrospective cohort study, Middle Aged, United States, Hematochezia, Population Surveillance, Hemostasis, Cohort, Female, Morbidity, Outcomes research, medicine.symptom, Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage, business, computer, Follow-Up Studies
الوصف: Background Data on the use of endoscopic hemostasis performed during colonoscopy for hematochezia are primarily derived from expert opinion and case series from tertiary care settings. Objectives To characterize patients with hematochezia who underwent in-patient colonoscopy and compare those who did and did not receive endoscopic hemostasis. Design Retrospective analysis. Setting Clinical Outcomes Research Initiative National Endoscopic Database, 2002 to 2008. Patients Adults with hematochezia. Interventions None. Main Outcome Measurements Demographics, comorbidities, practice setting, adverse events, and colonoscopy procedural characteristics and findings. Results We identified 3151 persons who underwent in-patient colonoscopy for hematochezia. Endoscopic hemostasis was performed in 144 patients (4.6%). Of those who received endoscopic hemostasis, the majority were male (60.3%), white (83.3%), and older (mean age 70.9 ± 12.3 years); had a low-risk American Society of Anesthesiologists classification (53.9%); and underwent colonoscopy in a community setting (67.4%). The hemostasis-receiving cohort was significantly more likely to be white (83.3% vs 71.0%, P = .02), have more comorbidities (classes 3 and 4, 46.2% vs 36.0%, P = .04), and have the cecum reached (95.8% vs 87.7%, P = .003). Those receiving hemostasis were significantly more likely to have an endoscopic diagnosis of arteriovenous malformations (32.6% vs 2.6%, P = .0001) or a solitary ulcer (8.3% vs 2.1%, P Limitations Retrospective database analysis. Conclusions Less than 5% of persons presenting with hematochezia and undergoing inpatient colonoscopy received endoscopic hemostasis. These findings differ from published tertiary care setting data. These data provide new insights into in-patient colonoscopy performed primarily in a community practice setting for patients with hematochezia.
تدمد: 0016-5107
URL الوصول: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::6443ab404baaff16104084a3f028e297
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2013.09.004
حقوق: OPEN
رقم الأكسشن: edsair.doi.dedup.....6443ab404baaff16104084a3f028e297
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE