The reliability of pseudoneglect is task dependent
| العنوان: | The reliability of pseudoneglect is task dependent |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Justin M. Ales, Julie M. Harris, S. E. Benstock, Alexandra G Mitchell |
| المساهمون: | The Wellcome Trust, University of St Andrews. Institute of Behavioural and Neural Sciences, University of St Andrews. School of Psychology and Neuroscience |
| المصدر: | Neuropsychologia |
| بيانات النشر: | Elsevier BV, 2020. |
| سنة النشر: | 2020 |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: | BF Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, media_common.quotation_subject, Bisection, BF, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Functional Laterality, Article, 050105 experimental psychology, Task (project management), 03 medical and health sciences, Behavioral Neuroscience, 0302 clinical medicine, Stimulus modality, Perception, Individual data, Humans, Attention, 0501 psychology and cognitive sciences, Vision, Ocular, Reliability (statistics), media_common, Landmark, 05 social sciences, Reproducibility of Results, DAS, Reliability, Response bias, Touch, Space Perception, RC0321, Pseudoneglect, Psychology, RC0321 Neuroscience. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry, 030217 neurology & neurosurgery, Cognitive psychology |
| الوصف: | Bisection tasks that require individuals to identify the midpoint of a line are often used to assess the presence of biases to spatial attention in both healthy and patient populations. These tasks have helped to uncover a phenomenon called pseudoneglect, a bias towards the left-side of space in healthy individuals. First identified in the tactile domain, pseudoneglect has been subsequently demonstrated in other sensory modalities such as vision. Despite this, the specific reliability of pseudoneglect within individuals across tasks and time has been investigated very little. In this study, we investigated the reliability of response bias within individuals across four separate testing sessions and during three line bisection tasks: landmark, line bisection and tactile rod bisection. Strong reliability was expected within individuals across task and session. Pseudoneglect was found when response bias was averaged across all tasks, for the entire sample. However, individual data showed biases to both left and right, with some participants showing no clear bias, demonstrating individual differences in bias. Significant, cross-session within-individual reliability was found for the landmark and tactile rod bisection tasks respectively, but no significant reliability was observed for the line bisection task. These results highlight the inconsistent nature of pseudoneglect within individuals, particularly across sensory modality. They also provide strong support for the use of the landmark task as the most reliable measure of pseudoneglect. Highlights • Reliability of pseudoneglect was assessed across 4 sessions and 3 tasks. • The landmark task was the most reliable test for pseudoneglect across sessions. • Responses to line bisection and tactile rod were less reliable across sessions. • Responses to different bisection tasks in the same individuals were not reliable. |
| وصف الملف: | application/pdf |
| تدمد: | 0028-3932 |
| URL الوصول: | https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::64f6728a7c2d35dd94727fc72cba7383 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107618 |
| حقوق: | OPEN |
| رقم الأكسشن: | edsair.doi.dedup.....64f6728a7c2d35dd94727fc72cba7383 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | OpenAIRE |
| تدمد: | 00283932 |
|---|