Limited diagnostic value of serum inflammatory biomarkers in the diagnosis of fracture-related infections

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Limited diagnostic value of serum inflammatory biomarkers in the diagnosis of fracture-related infections
المؤلفون: Martin A. McNally, Daniel T. Watts, Nicholas A. Athanasou, Mario Morgenstern, Maria Dudareva, Irene K. Sigmund
المصدر: The bonejoint journal. (7)
سنة النشر: 2020
مصطلحات موضوعية: Adult, Male, medicine.medical_specialty, Adolescent, Neutrophils, Gastroenterology, Sensitivity and Specificity, 030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging, 03 medical and health sciences, Fractures, Bone, Leukocyte Count, 0302 clinical medicine, Internal medicine, White blood cell, medicine, Humans, Surgical Wound Infection, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, Aged, Retrospective Studies, Aged, 80 and over, 030222 orthopedics, business.industry, Decision Trees, Middle Aged, Inflammatory biomarkers, medicine.anatomical_structure, C-Reactive Protein, Surgery, Female, business, Value (mathematics), Biomarkers
الوصف: Aims The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of preoperative serum CRP, white blood cell count (WBC), percentage of neutrophils (%N), and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) when using the fracture-related infection (FRI) consensus definition. Methods A cohort of 106 patients having surgery for suspected septic nonunion after failed fracture fixation were studied. Blood samples were collected preoperatively, and the concentration of serum CRP, WBC, and differential cell count were analyzed. The areas under the curve (AUCs) of diagnostic tests were compared using the z-test. Regression trees were constructed and internally cross-validated to derive a simple diagnostic decision tree. Results Using the FRI consensus definition, 46 patients (43%) were identified as infected. Sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of CRP were 67% (95% confidence interval (CI) 52% to 80%), 61% (95% CI 47% to 74%), and 0.64 (95% CI 0.54 to 0.74); of WBC count were 17% (95% CI 9% to 31%), 95% (95% CI 86% to 99%), and 0.57 (95% CI 0.50 to 0.62); of %N 13% (95% CI 6% to 26%), 87% (95% CI 76% to 93%), and 0.50 (95% CI 0.43 to 0.56); and of NLR 28% (95% CI 17% to 43%), 80% (95% CI 68% to 88%), and 0.54 (95% CI 0.46 to 0.63), respectively. A better performance of serum CRP was shown in comparison to the leucocyte count (p = 0.006), %N (p < 0.001), and NLR (p = 0.001). A statistically lower serum CRP level was shown in patients with an infection caused by a low virulence microorganism in comparison to high virulence bacteria (p = 0.008). We found that a simple decision tree approach using only low serum neutrophils (< 3.615 × 109/l) and low CRP (< 2.45 mg/l) may allow better identification of aseptic cases. Conclusion The evaluated serum inflammatory markers showed limited diagnostic value in the preoperative diagnosis of FRI when using the uniform FRI Consensus Definition. Therefore, they should remain as suggestive criteria in diagnosing FRI. Although CRP showed a higher performance in comparison to the other serum markers, it is insufficiently accurate to diagnose a septic nonunion, especially when caused by low virulence microorganisms. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(7):904–911.
تدمد: 2049-4408
URL الوصول: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::6812c66ca80220ea2c0780e9b6a7afc8
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32600147
حقوق: CLOSED
رقم الأكسشن: edsair.doi.dedup.....6812c66ca80220ea2c0780e9b6a7afc8
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE