Perceptions of Similarity Can Mislead Provenancing Strategies—An Example from Five Co-Distributed Acacia Species
العنوان: | Perceptions of Similarity Can Mislead Provenancing Strategies—An Example from Five Co-Distributed Acacia Species |
---|---|
المؤلفون: | Jia Yee Samantha Yap, Monica Fahey, Joel Cohen, Marlien van der Merwe, Jason G. Bragg, Peter R. Wilson, Maurizio Rossetto |
المصدر: | Diversity Volume 12 Issue 8 Diversity, Vol 12, Iss 306, p 306 (2020) |
بيانات النشر: | Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, 2020. |
سنة النشر: | 2020 |
مصطلحات موضوعية: | Population, ecological restoration, Variation (game tree), Representativeness heuristic, Environmental data, Genetic variation, education, Restoration ecology, lcsh:QH301-705.5, climate matching, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Genetic diversity, education.field_of_study, Ecology, business.industry, Ecological Modeling, multispecies comparison, Environmental resource management, landscape genetics, Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous), Geography, lcsh:Biology (General), Sustainability, genetic provenance, business, convex hull, SNPs |
الوصف: | Ecological restoration requires balancing levels of genetic diversity to achieve present-day establishment as well as long-term sustainability. Assumptions based on distributional, taxonomic or functional generalizations are often made when deciding how to source plant material for restoration. We investigate this assumption and ask whether species-specific data is required to optimize provenancing strategies. We use population genetic and environmental data from five congeneric and largely co-distributed species of Acacia to specifically ask how different species-specific genetic provenancing strategies are based on empirical data and how well a simple, standardized collection strategy would work when applied to the same species. We find substantial variability in terms of patterns of genetic diversity and differentiation across the landscape among these five co-distributed Acacia species. This variation translates into substantial differences in genetic provenancing recommendations among species (ranging from 100% to less than 1% of observed genetic variation across species) that could not have been accurately predicted a priori based on simple observation or overall distributional patterns. Furthermore, when a common provenancing strategy was applied to each species, the recommended collection areas and the evolutionary representativeness of such artificially standardized areas were substantially different (smaller) from those identified based on environmental and genetic data. We recommend the implementation of the increasingly accessible array of evolutionary-based methodologies and information to optimize restoration efforts. |
وصف الملف: | application/pdf |
اللغة: | English |
تدمد: | 1424-2818 |
DOI: | 10.3390/d12080306 |
URL الوصول: | https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::6c5f5e2712750b3769fadb40738c2e0d |
حقوق: | OPEN |
رقم الأكسشن: | edsair.doi.dedup.....6c5f5e2712750b3769fadb40738c2e0d |
قاعدة البيانات: | OpenAIRE |
تدمد: | 14242818 |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.3390/d12080306 |