External validation of risk prediction model M4 in an Australian population: Rationalising the management of pregnancies of unknown location

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: External validation of risk prediction model M4 in an Australian population: Rationalising the management of pregnancies of unknown location
المؤلفون: George Condous, Shannon Reid, Mathew Leonardi, N. Stamatopoulos, B. Nadim
المصدر: The AustralianNew Zealand journal of obstetricsgynaecologyReferences. 60(6)
سنة النشر: 2019
مصطلحات موضوعية: Adult, medicine.medical_specialty, Pregnancy Tests, Intrauterine pregnancy, Chorionic Gonadotropin, Sensitivity and Specificity, Miscarriage, Predictive Value of Tests, Pregnancy, Transvaginal sonography, medicine, Humans, Retrospective Studies, Ectopic pregnancy, business.industry, Obstetrics, External validation, Australia, Pregnancy Outcome, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproducibility of Results, General Medicine, Models, Theoretical, medicine.disease, Pregnancy, Ectopic, Australian population, ROC Curve, Cohort, Female, Triage, business
الوصف: Background The prediction model M4 can successfully classify pregnancy of unknown location (PUL) into a low- or high-risk group in developing ectopic pregnancy. M4 was validated in UK centres but in very few other countries outside UK. Aim To validate the M4 model's ability to correctly classify PULs in a cohort of Australian women. Materials and methods A retrospective analysis of women classified with PUL, attending a Sydney-based teaching hospital between 2006 and 2018. The reference standard was the final characterisation of PUL: failed PUL (FPUL) or intrauterine pregnancy (IUP; low risk) vs ectopic pregnancy (EP) or persistent PUL (PPUL; high risk). Each patient was entered into the M4 model calculator and an estimated risk of FPUL/IUP or EP/PPUL was recorded. Diagnostic accuracy of the M4 model was evaluated. Results Of 9077 consecutive women who underwent transvaginal sonography, 713 (7.9%) classified with a PUL. Six hundred and seventy-seven (95.0%) had complete study data and were included. Final outcomes were: 422 (62.3%) FPULs, 150 (22.2%) IUPs, 105 (15.5%) EPs and PPULs. The M4 model classified 455 (67.2%) as low-risk PULs of which 434 (95.4%) were FPULs/IUPs and 21 (4.6%) were EPs or PPULs. EPs/PPULs were correctly classified with sensitivity of 80.0% (95% CI 71.1-86.5%), specificity of 75.9% (95% CI 72.2-79.3%), positive predictive value of 37.8% (95% CI 33.8-42.1%) and negative predictive value of 95.3% (95% CI 93.1-96.9%). Conclusions We have externally validated the prediction model M4. It classified 67.2% of PULs as low risk, of which 95.4% were later characterised as FPULs or IUPs while still classifying 80.0% of EPs as high risk.
تدمد: 1479-828X
URL الوصول: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::7b75ecf19f8da74dc7e4a009cb2ea6c5
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32538482
حقوق: CLOSED
رقم الأكسشن: edsair.doi.dedup.....7b75ecf19f8da74dc7e4a009cb2ea6c5
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE