A Pilot Study Comparing Aortic Valve Area Estimates Derived from Fick Cardiac Output with Estimates Based on Cheetah-NICOM Cardiac Output
| العنوان: | A Pilot Study Comparing Aortic Valve Area Estimates Derived from Fick Cardiac Output with Estimates Based on Cheetah-NICOM Cardiac Output |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Kinjal M. Patel, Vineeth Nagubandi, Janah Aji, Zahi Rafeq, Jeffrey Ogbara, John P. Gaughan, Debbie Orr, Noud van Helmond, Michael Rosenbloom, Georges Kaddissi, Ahmed Awad, Ludmil Mitrev |
| المصدر: | Scientific Reports Scientific Reports, Vol 10, Iss 1, Pp 1-9 (2020) Scientific Reports, 10, 1 Scientific Reports, 10 |
| سنة النشر: | 2019 |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: | Male, medicine.medical_specialty, Cardiac output, medicine.medical_treatment, Cardiology, lcsh:Medicine, Pilot Projects, Fick method, 030204 cardiovascular system & hematology, Article, Healthcare improvement science Radboud Institute for Health Sciences [Radboudumc 18], 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, 030202 anesthesiology, Internal medicine, medicine, Humans, In patient, Cardiac Output, lcsh:Science, Cardiac catheterization, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Multidisciplinary, business.industry, Limits of agreement, lcsh:R, Middle Aged, medicine.disease, Confidence interval, Stenosis, Aortic valve area, Aortic Valve, lcsh:Q, Female, business, Interventional cardiology |
| الوصف: | Cardiac output during cardiac catheterization is often estimated using the modified Fick method (COFick). In this proof-of-concept, prospective non-randomized study carried out in a single academic healthcare centre, we examined whether replacing COFick in the Gorlin formula with Cheetah-NICOM monitor cardiac output (COCheetah) could produce an accurate and precise estimate of aortic valve area in patients with severe aortic stenosis. In twenty-six subjects, COFick and COCheetah were obtained concurrently. A spot and 3-minute running average of COCheetah was used. Bland and Altman analysis was used to derive bias, 95% limits of agreement (LOA) and confidence intervals (CI). The mean difference (bias) between AVACheetah (average) and AVAFick was 0.11 cm2 and the 95% LOA were ±0.42 cm2. The 95% CI of the bias was 0.02–0.2 cm2. The bias and 95% LOA of AVACheetah (spot value) were 0.14 ± 0.42cm2, with a 95% CI of 0.06–0.23 cm2. No proportional bias was present. AVACheetah thus appears to be a reasonably accurate measure of AVA in patients with severe aortic stenosis compared to AVAFick measured using a modified Fick CO. However, the limits of agreement were not narrow enough to consider AVACheetah and AVAFick interchangeable. |
| وصف الملف: | application/pdf |
| تدمد: | 2045-2322 |
| URL الوصول: | https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::85098ebfc129741b109209c186d7d0a1 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32398730 |
| حقوق: | OPEN |
| رقم الأكسشن: | edsair.doi.dedup.....85098ebfc129741b109209c186d7d0a1 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | OpenAIRE |
| تدمد: | 20452322 |
|---|