Use of Nucleic Acid Amplification Testing for Rapid Detection of

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Use of Nucleic Acid Amplification Testing for Rapid Detection of
المؤلفون: Lori R. Armstrong, Rongxia Li, Varsha Kumar, Amy N. Whitesell, Angela M. Starks, Tracy Dalton
المصدر: Open Forum Infect Dis
سنة النشر: 2021
مصطلحات موضوعية: Tuberculosis, biology, business.industry, medicine.disease, biology.organism_classification, Virology, Rapid detection, nervous system diseases, Major Articles, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Infectious Diseases, Oncology, Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex, nervous system, immune system diseases, mental disorders, medicine, Nucleic acid, Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests, Sputum, medicine.symptom, business
الوصف: Background Nucleic acid amplification (NAA) tests rapidly detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex directly from clinical specimens, providing valuable results for those evaluated for tuberculosis. Methods We analyzed characteristics of cases with NAA testing performed, compared cases with positive and negative NAA test results, and calculated turnaround time and time-to-treatment for all verified cases reported to the National Tuberculosis Surveillance System in the United States during 2011–2017. Results Among 67,082 verified tuberculosis cases with NAA testing information, 30,820 (45.9%) were reported as not having a NAA test performed; the proportion without NAA testing declined annually, from 60.5% in 2011 to 33.6% in 2017. Of 67,082 verified cases, 27,912 (41.6%) had positive, 8,215 (12.2%) had negative, and 135 (0.2%) had indeterminate NAA test results. Among the 33,937 cases with an acid-fast-bacilli–smear-positive result, 70.9% (24,093) had a NAA test performed; 38.0% (11,490) of the 30,244 with an acid-fast-bacilli–smear-negative result had a NAA test performed. Although sputum was the most common specimen type tested, 79.8% (7,023 of 8,804) of non-sputum specimen types had a positive NAA test result. Overall, 63.7% of cases with laboratory testing had NAA test results reported Conclusions Our analyses demonstrate increased NAA test utilization between 2011 and 2017. However, a large proportion of cases did not have a NAA test performed, reflecting challenges in broader uptake, suggesting an opportunity to expand use of this diagnostic methodology.
تدمد: 2328-8957
URL الوصول: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::8a601fa9616bdffd29982075aca4dfb1
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35559127
حقوق: OPEN
رقم الأكسشن: edsair.doi.dedup.....8a601fa9616bdffd29982075aca4dfb1
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE