Commentary: Enlightened Democracy in Practice

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Commentary: Enlightened Democracy in Practice
المؤلفون: Oliver Feeney
المصدر: Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics
بيانات النشر: Cambridge University Press (CUP), 2018.
سنة النشر: 2018
مصطلحات موضوعية: Gene Editing, Special Section: Genome Editing: Biomedical and Ethical Perspectives, moral pluralism, Health (social science), democracy, public policy, Health Policy, media_common.quotation_subject, Politics, Democracy, public engagement, Issues, ethics and legal aspects, moral psychology, Political science, Law, Humans, genome editing, media_common
الوصف: How should we regulate genome editing in the face of persistent substantive disagreement about the moral status of this technology and its applications? In this paper, we aim to contribute to resolving this question. We first present two diametrically opposed possible approaches to the regulation of genome editing. A first approach, which we refer to as “elitist,” is inspired by Joshua Greene’s work in moral psychology. It aims to derive at an abstract theoretical level what preferences people would have if they were committed to implementing public policies regulating genome editing in a context of ethical pluralism. The second approach, which we refer to as the democratic approach, defended by Francoise Baylis and Sheila Jasanoff et al., emphasizes the importance of including the public’s expressed attitudes in the regulation of genome editing. After pointing out a serious shortcoming with each of these approaches, we propose our own favored approach—the “enlightened democracy” approach—which attempts to combine the strengths of the elitist and democratic approaches while avoiding their weaknesses.
تدمد: 1469-2147
0963-1801
URL الوصول: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::965a33e7ffa2aeb2e6d8e52425ce049b
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0963180118000415
حقوق: OPEN
رقم الأكسشن: edsair.doi.dedup.....965a33e7ffa2aeb2e6d8e52425ce049b
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE