Clinical Reasoning for Speech Sound Disorders: Diagnosis and Intervention in Speech-Language Pathologists' Daily Practice
العنوان: | Clinical Reasoning for Speech Sound Disorders: Diagnosis and Intervention in Speech-Language Pathologists' Daily Practice |
---|---|
المؤلفون: | Leenke van Haaften, Sanne Diepeveen, Ben Maassen, Hayo Terband, Bert J. M. de Swart |
المصدر: | American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 29, 3, pp. 1529-1549 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY, 29, 1529-1549 American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 29, 1529-1549 American journal of speech-language pathology, 29(3), 1529-1549. AMER SPEECH-LANGUAGE-HEARING ASSOC |
سنة النشر: | 2020 |
مصطلحات موضوعية: | Linguistics and Language, Speech-Language Pathology, MEDLINE, Psychological intervention, INVENTORY, CHILDREN, Clinical Reasoning, ORAL MOTOR EXERCISES, Speech Sound Disorder, Terminology, 030507 speech-language pathology & audiology, 03 medical and health sciences, Speech and Hearing, All institutes and research themes of the Radboud University Medical Center, Intervention (counseling), Surveys and Questionnaires, Developmental and Educational Psychology, medicine, Humans, Speech, 0501 psychology and cognitive sciences, KNOWLEDGE, Medical diagnosis, Everyday life, Child, Netherlands, CHILDHOOD APRAXIA, 05 social sciences, Variety (linguistics), medicine.disease, Disorders of movement Donders Center for Medical Neuroscience [Radboudumc 3], Pathologists, Otorhinolaryngology, Speech sound disorder, TESTS, INTELLIGIBILITY, Female, 0305 other medical science, Psychology, 050104 developmental & child psychology, Clinical psychology |
الوصف: | Purpose This study aims to give an insight in clinical reasoning (diagnosis and intervention) of speech-language pathologists (SLPs) in the Netherlands for children with speech sound disorder (SSD). Method The study featured a mixed-method (qualitative and quantitative) design. Semistructured interviews containing nondirective, open-ended questions were conducted with 33 SLPs, which were analyzed using a constant comparative analysis. Other SLPs (137) filled out a questionnaire on the same topics. Multiple-choice questions were analyzed by descriptive frequencies, while open-ended questions were analyzed thematically. Results The results indicate that SLPs use a variety of assessments to diagnose SSD, complemented by observation and, often, case history. In total, 85 different diagnostic labels were reported. The choice of intervention is based on what is appealing to the child and what matches his or her age as well as on the specific diagnosis and severity. Interventions are used for multiple speech disorders, and according to SLPs, parents play a large role in diagnostics and intervention. Conclusion These results reveal the need for (a) a clear and consistent terminology of diagnoses in the field of pediatric SSD, (b) a fast and easy-to-administer comprehensive differential diagnostic instrument in combination with an instrument to assess participation in everyday life, and (c) a tool to conduct a case history online. |
وصف الملف: | application/pdf |
تدمد: | 1058-0360 |
URL الوصول: | https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::99e112ff959d31ce37af2d946785e2d8 https://hdl.handle.net/2066/221644 |
حقوق: | OPEN |
رقم الأكسشن: | edsair.doi.dedup.....99e112ff959d31ce37af2d946785e2d8 |
قاعدة البيانات: | OpenAIRE |
تدمد: | 10580360 |
---|