Comparative analysis of Optical Microscopy, Scanning Electron Microscopy, and Micro-Computed Tomography on measurements

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Comparative analysis of Optical Microscopy, Scanning Electron Microscopy, and Micro-Computed Tomography on measurements
المؤلفون: Flávio Domingues das Neves, Karla Zancopé, Thiago de Almeida Prado Naves Carneiro, Caio César Dias Resende, Murilo Navarro de Oliviera, Frederick Khalil Karam
المصدر: Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences, Vol 16 (2017)
بيانات النشر: Universidade Estadual de Campinas, 2017.
سنة النشر: 2017
مصطلحات موضوعية: 0301 basic medicine, Measurement method, Materials science, Scanning electron microscope, Micro computed tomography, Measurements. Dental implants. Optical microscope. Micro-CT. Electron microscope, RK1-715, 030206 dentistry, law.invention, 03 medical and health sciences, 030104 developmental biology, 0302 clinical medicine, Optical microscope, law, Dentistry, Tomography, Electron microscope, Micro ct, General Dentistry, Biomedical engineering
الوصف: Microscopic measurements are widely used in scientific research and the correct equipment to perform these evaluations could be critical to determine study results. Regarding microscopic measurements, three of the most used methods are: Optical Microscopy (OM), Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), and Micro-computed Tomography (MCT). It is important to select the best method for assessing diverse parameters, considering operational characteristics of the method, the equipment efficiency, and the machinery cost. Aim: Therefore, the main objective of this study was to define which is the most useful measurement method for assessing magnitudes below 0.4 mm. Methods: Ten dental implants, with known dimensions as defined by the manufacturer were randomly distributed. Two blinded observers assessed the distance between the second and the third screw vortex of the implants using three suggested methods. The true distance was defined to be 0.5 mm. Results: The assessed distances were: 0.597±0.007mm for OM, 0.578±0.017mm for SEM, and 0.613±0.006mm for MCT. The assessed distances were significantly different when the methods were compared (P>0.01). All measurements were into the CAD tolerances. Conclusion: It was possible to conclude that linear measurements between 595 and 605 μm could be performed by any of the described technologies.
اللغة: English
تدمد: 1677-3225
URL الوصول: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::9b64d11a759012c5f65327208c9e65b2
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8651056
حقوق: OPEN
رقم الأكسشن: edsair.doi.dedup.....9b64d11a759012c5f65327208c9e65b2
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE