Dose-dependent neurorestorative effects of amantadine after cortical impact injury

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Dose-dependent neurorestorative effects of amantadine after cortical impact injury
المؤلفون: Tracey Lam, Michael S. Helkowski, Corina O. Bondi, Anthony E. Kline, Brittany J. Royes, Adaora A. Okigbo, Jeffrey P. Cheng, Isabel H. Bleimeister, Gina C. Bao
المصدر: Neuroscience Letters. 694:69-73
بيانات النشر: Elsevier BV, 2019.
سنة النشر: 2019
مصطلحات موضوعية: Male, 0301 basic medicine, Adult male, Traumatic brain injury, medicine.medical_treatment, Dopamine Agents, Spatial Learning, Dose dependence, Motor Activity, Article, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, Brain Injuries, Traumatic, Amantadine, medicine, Animals, Dosing, Clinical efficacy, Saline, Behavior, Animal, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, business.industry, General Neuroscience, medicine.disease, Neuroprotective Agents, 030104 developmental biology, Anesthesia, Spatial learning, business, 030217 neurology & neurosurgery, medicine.drug
الوصف: Numerous pharmacotherapies have been evaluated after experimental traumatic brain injury (TBI). While amantadine (AMT) has shown potential for clinical efficacy, the few studies on its effectiveness have been mixed. It is possible that suboptimal dosing, due to the evaluation of only one dose, may be causing the discrepancies in outcomes. Hence, the goal of the current study was to conduct a dose response of AMT after TBI to determine an optimal behavioral benefit. Anesthetized adult male rats received either a cortical impact of moderate severity or sham injury and then were randomly assigned to receive once daily intraperitoneally injections of AMT (10, 20, or 40 mg/kg) or saline vehicle (VEH, 1 mL/kg) commencing 24 hr after injury for 19 days. Motor and cognitive function were assessed on post-operative days 1-5 and 14-19, respectively. There were no statistical differences among the sham groups treated with AMT or VEH so the data were pooled. AMT (20 mg/kg) facilitated beam-balance recovery and spatial learning relative to VEH-treated controls (p < 0.05). No other doses of AMT were effective. These results indicate that dosing should be carefully considered when assessing the effects of pharmacotherapies after TBI, such that potential benefits are not inadvertently missed.
تدمد: 0304-3940
URL الوصول: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::9ebbe60d40da0c5aa341590370f28316
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2018.11.030
حقوق: OPEN
رقم الأكسشن: edsair.doi.dedup.....9ebbe60d40da0c5aa341590370f28316
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE