Critical exon indexing improves clinical interpretation of copy number variants in neurodevelopmental disorders

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Critical exon indexing improves clinical interpretation of copy number variants in neurodevelopmental disorders
المؤلفون: Aparna Prasad, Hope Twede, Karen S. Ho, Stephanie Page, Kyle W. Davis, E. Robert Wassman, Moises A. Serrano, Andreas Peiffer, Megan M. Martin, Diana Bertrand, Mohammed Uddin, Stephen W. Scherer, Rena Vanzo, Charles H. Hensel
المصدر: Neurology: Genetics
بيانات النشر: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), 2019.
سنة النشر: 2019
مصطلحات موضوعية: 0303 health sciences, Microarray analysis techniques, Computational biology, Random series, Clinical literature, Biology, Article, 03 medical and health sciences, Exon, 0302 clinical medicine, Unknown Significance, Clinical significance, Neurology (clinical), Copy-number variation, 030217 neurology & neurosurgery, Genetics (clinical), 030304 developmental biology
الوصف: ObjectiveTo evaluate a new tool to aid interpretation of copy number variants (CNVs) in individuals with neurodevelopmental disabilities.MethodsCritical exon indexing (CEI) was used to identify genes with critical exons (CEGs) from clinically reported CNVs, which may contribute to neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs). The 742 pathogenic CNVs and 1,363 variants of unknown significance (VUS) identified by chromosomal microarray analysis in 5,487 individuals with NDDs were subjected to CEI to identify CEGs. CEGs identified in a subsequent random series of VUS were evaluated for relevance to CNV interpretation.ResultsCEI identified a total of 2,492 unique CEGs in pathogenic CNVs and 953 in VUS compared with 259 CEGs in 6,965 CNVs from 873 controls. These differences are highly significant (p < 0.00001) whether compared as frequency, average, or normalized by CNV size. Twenty-one percent of VUS CEGs were not represented in Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man, highlighting limitations of existing resources for identifying potentially impactful genes within CNVs. CEGs were highly correlated with other indices and known pathways of relevance. Separately, 136 random VUS reports were reevaluated, and 76% of CEGs had not been commented on. In multiple cases, further investigation yielded additional relevant literature aiding interpretation. As one specific example, we discuss GTF2I as a CEG, which likely alters interpretation of several reported duplication VUS in the Williams-Beuren region.ConclusionsApplication of CEI to CNVs in individuals with NDDs can identify genes of potential clinical relevance, aid laboratories in effectively searching the clinical literature, and support the clinical reporting of poorly annotated VUS.
تدمد: 2376-7839
URL الوصول: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::a0644ba70a354a0029a1e458cbe60b22
https://doi.org/10.1212/nxg.0000000000000378
حقوق: OPEN
رقم الأكسشن: edsair.doi.dedup.....a0644ba70a354a0029a1e458cbe60b22
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE