A review of methods and data to determine raw material criticality
| العنوان: | A review of methods and data to determine raw material criticality |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Min Ha Lee, Luis Tercero, Roland Gauss, Layla van Ellen, Atsufumi Hirohata, Roderick G. Eggert, Christian Hagelüken, David Peck, Gian Andrea Blengini, Komal Habib, Wei-Qiang Chen, Milan Grohol, Philip Nuss, Alessandra Hool, Armin Reller, Andrea Thorenz, Margarethe Hofmann-Amtenbrink, James Goddin, Keisuke Nansai, Jo Dewulf, Patrick Wäger, Jan Kosmol, Dieuwertje Schrijvers, Gang Liu, Maïté Le Gleuher, Guido Sonnemann, Anthony Ku |
| المساهمون: | Publica, Institut des Sciences Moléculaires (ISM), Université Montesquieu - Bordeaux 4-Université Sciences et Technologies - Bordeaux 1-École Nationale Supérieure de Chimie et de Physique de Bordeaux (ENSCPB)-Institut de Chimie du CNRS (INC)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Insitute of Geology China Earthquake Administration Beijing 100029, China (X.X., G.C., W.C.) (INSITUTE OF GEOLOGY), Insitute of Geology, Umicore, umicore Hanau, Bureau de Recherches Géologiques et Minières (BRGM) (BRGM), State Key Lab. of Information Engineering in Surveying, Mapping and Remote Sensing, Wuhan University [China], Université Pierre et Marie Curie - Paris 6 (UPMC) |
| المصدر: | Resources, Conservation and Recycling Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Elsevier, 2020, 155, pp.104617. ⟨10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104617⟩ Schrijvers, D, Hool, A, Blengini, G A, Chen, W Q, Dewulf, J, Eggert, R, van Ellen, L, Gauss, R, Goddin, J, Habib, K, Hagelüken, C, Hirohata, A, Hofmann-Amtenbrink, M, Kosmol, J, Le Gleuher, M, Grohol, M, Ku, A, Lee, M H, Liu, G, Nansai, K, Nuss, P, Peck, D, Reller, A, Sonnemann, G, Tercero, L, Thorenz, A & Wäger, P A 2020, ' A review of methods and data to determine raw material criticality ', Resources, Conservation and Recycling, vol. 155, 104617 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104617 RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING |
| سنة النشر: | 2020 |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: | INDICATORS, Critical raw materials, Economics and Econometrics, Computer science, FLOW, Best practice, media_common.quotation_subject, 0211 other engineering and technologies, Vulnerability, [SDU.STU]Sciences of the Universe [physics]/Earth Sciences, Material criticality, 02 engineering and technology, 010501 environmental sciences, MINERALS, 01 natural sciences, Representativeness heuristic, GEOPOLITICAL SUPPLY RISK, ENVIRONMENTAL-IMPACT, criticality assessment, EVALUATE, Quality (business), 021108 energy, PERSPECTIVE, Waste Management and Disposal, ComputingMilieux_MISCELLANEOUS, critical resources, 0105 earth and related environmental sciences, media_common, Criticality assessment, Strategic raw materials, critical raw materials, RESILIENCE, FRAMEWORK, Critical resources, material criticality, Identification (information), Criticality, Risk analysis (engineering), [SDU]Sciences of the Universe [physics], Earth and Environmental Sciences, Data quality, METALS, strategic raw materials |
| الوصف: | The assessment of the criticality of raw materials allows the identification of the likelihood of a supply disruption of a material and the vulnerability of a system (e.g. a national economy, technology, or company) to this disruption. Inconclusive outcomes of various studies suggest that criticality assessments would benefit from the identification of best practices. To prepare the field for such guidance, this paper aims to clarify the mechanisms that affect methodological choices which influence the results of a study. This is achieved via literature review and round table discussions among international experts. The paper demonstrates that criticality studies are divergent in the system under study, the anticipated risk, the purpose of the study, and material selection. These differences in goal and scope naturally result in different choices regarding indicator selection, the required level of aggregation as well as the subsequent choice of aggregation method, and the need for a threshold value. However, this link is often weak, which suggests a lack of understanding of cause-and-effect mechanisms of indicators and outcomes. Data availability is a key factor that limits the evaluation of criticality. Furthermore, data quality, including both data uncertainty and data representativeness, is rarely addressed in the interpretation and communication of results. Clear guidance in the formulation of goals and scopes of criticality studies, the selection of adequate indicators and aggregation methods, and the interpretation of the outcomes, are important initial steps in improving the quality of criticality assessments. |
| وصف الملف: | application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document; application/pdf |
| اللغة: | English |
| تدمد: | 0921-3449 1879-0658 |
| URL الوصول: | https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::bb6b985cf9bcfe8c965bfcc94a9337f3 https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/152732/1/A_review_of_methods_and_data_to_determine_raw_material_criticality_revised_highlights.docx |
| حقوق: | OPEN |
| رقم الأكسشن: | edsair.doi.dedup.....bb6b985cf9bcfe8c965bfcc94a9337f3 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | OpenAIRE |
| تدمد: | 09213449 18790658 |
|---|