PSVII-15 Use of computer-assisted sperm analyses (CASA) and flow cytometry to explain Angus bull field fertility differences

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: PSVII-15 Use of computer-assisted sperm analyses (CASA) and flow cytometry to explain Angus bull field fertility differences
المؤلفون: L. H. Cruppe, L. D. Peters, Kristina McDonald, Mel DeJarnette, J. Dalton, Bahman Shafii, J Moraes Vasconcelos, S Menegatti Zoca, William J. Price, M. D. Utt, B.R. Harstine
المصدر: Journal of Animal Science. 96:55-56
بيانات النشر: Oxford University Press (OUP), 2018.
سنة النشر: 2018
مصطلحات موضوعية: endocrine system, animal structures, Field (physics), medicine.diagnostic_test, urogenital system, media_common.quotation_subject, Fertility, General Medicine, Biology, Sperm, Flow cytometry, Andrology, Abstracts, Genetics, medicine, Animal Science and Zoology, Food Science, media_common
الوصف: The objective was to evaluate whether computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA) and flow cytometry (FC) could explain differences in field fertility of five Angus bulls. The hypothesis was that high fertility bulls would exhibit the highest values for total motility (TM), progressive motility (PM), and intact plasma membranes, intact acrosomes, and normal calcium influx (VANCa), and lowest values for DNA fragmentation index (DFI). Two 0.5-mL straws (10 to 40 million sperm/straw) from each bull and same collection date were thawed simultaneously, pooled, and assayed in duplicate (n=92). Samples for CASA were stained with Hoechst 33342 and evaluated for TM and PM. In FC, the percentage of cells with VANCa were identified using a multiparametric staining procedure (Hoechst 33342, propidium-iodide, fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated peanut agglutinin-647 and fluo-3-acetomethoxy ester) and reported as a single population. DNA stability was assayed with acridine orange and reported as the percentage of single-stranded DNA (DFI). A generalized linear mixed model was used to analyze bull, duplicate, and their interaction as fixed effects, while collection date was considered a random effect and a beta distribution was assumed (SAS 9.4). There was no effect of duplicate or interaction (P>0.1). CASA and FC characteristics were different between bulls (P
تدمد: 1525-3163
0021-8812
URL الوصول: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::bc254a2443e8f3390e28d1037fc3a4c2
https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/sky404.123
حقوق: OPEN
رقم الأكسشن: edsair.doi.dedup.....bc254a2443e8f3390e28d1037fc3a4c2
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE