Quantification of soya‐based feed ingredient entry from ASFV‐positive countries to the United States by ocean freight shipping and associated seaports
| العنوان: | Quantification of soya‐based feed ingredient entry from ASFV‐positive countries to the United States by ocean freight shipping and associated seaports |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Gilbert Patterson, Scott Dee, Gordon Spronk, Megan C. Niederwerder |
| المصدر: | Transboundary and Emerging Diseases |
| بيانات النشر: | Hindawi Limited, 2020. |
| سنة النشر: | 2020 |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: | soya bean meal, 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak, Internationality, Soya bean, Swine, 040301 veterinary sciences, Oceans and Seas, Short Communication, Short Communications, Tariff, Objective data, feed ingredients, International trade commission, Agricultural economics, 0403 veterinary science, 03 medical and health sciences, Ingredient, Animals, China, 030304 developmental biology, 0303 health sciences, General Veterinary, General Immunology and Microbiology, Animal disease, Commerce, 04 agricultural and veterinary sciences, General Medicine, African Swine Fever Virus, Animal Feed, United States, Business, ASFV, seaports |
| الوصف: | African swine fever virus (ASFV) can survive in soya‐based products for 30 days with T ½ ranging from 9.6 to 12.9 days in soya bean meals and soya oil cake. As the United States imports soya‐based products from several ASFV‐positive countries, knowledge of the type and quantity of these specific imports, and their ports of entry (POE), is necessary information to manage risk. Using the data from the International Trade Commission Harmonized Tariff Schedule website in conjunction with pivot tables, we analysed imports across air, land and sea POE of soya‐based products from 43 ASFV‐positive countries to the United States during 2018 and 2019. In 2018, 104,366 metric tons (MT) of soya‐based products, specifically conventional and organic soya bean meal, soya beans, soya oil cake and soya oil were imported from these countries into the United States via seaports only. The two largest suppliers were China (52.7%, 55,034 MT) and the Ukraine (42.9%, 44,775 MT). In 2019, 73,331 MT entered the United States and 54.7% (40,143 MT) came from the Ukraine and 8.4% (6,182 MT) from China. Regarding POE, 80.9%–83.2% of soya‐based imports from China entered the United States at the seaports of San Francisco, CA, and Seattle, WA, while 89.4%–100% entered from the Ukraine via the seaports of New Orleans, LA, and Charlotte, NC. Analysis of five‐year trends (2015–2019) of the volume of soya imports from China indicated reduction over time (with a noticeably sharp decrease between 2018 and 2019), and seaport utilization was consistent. In contrast, volume remained high for Ukrainian soya imports, and seaport utilization was inconsistent. Overall, this exercise introduced a new approach to collect objective data on an important risk factor, providing researchers, government officials and industry stakeholders a means to objectively identify and quantify potential channels of foreign animal disease entry into the United States. |
| تدمد: | 1865-1682 1865-1674 |
| URL الوصول: | https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::c5b08b8b894ae79c655f81debf857b5f https://doi.org/10.1111/tbed.13881 |
| حقوق: | OPEN |
| رقم الأكسشن: | edsair.doi.dedup.....c5b08b8b894ae79c655f81debf857b5f |
| قاعدة البيانات: | OpenAIRE |
| تدمد: | 18651682 18651674 |
|---|