Accuracy of MDS-UPDRS section IV for detecting motor fluctuations in Parkinson’s disease

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Accuracy of MDS-UPDRS section IV for detecting motor fluctuations in Parkinson’s disease
المؤلفون: Valeria Dibilio, Mario Zappia, Alessandra Nicoletti, Roberta Bonomo, Giovanni Mostile, Calogero Edoardo Cicero, Antonina Luca, Giorgia Sciacca, Loredana Raciti, Giulia Donzuso
المساهمون: Raciti, L, Nicoletti, A, Mostile, G, Bonomo, R, Dibilio, V, Donzuso, G, Sciacca, G, Cicero, C, Luca, A, Zappia, M
بيانات النشر: Springer-Verlag Italia s.r.l., 2019.
سنة النشر: 2019
مصطلحات موضوعية: Adult, medicine.medical_specialty, 12-h waking-day motor assessment (WDMA), Parkinson's disease, Neurology, Movement disorders, MDS-UPDRS validation, Mds updrs, Dermatology, Sensitivity and Specificity, 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, Rating scale, Internal medicine, medicine, Humans, Single-Blind Method, 030212 general & internal medicine, Wearing-off, Dyskinesia, business.industry, 12-h waking-day motor assessment (WDMA), Dyskinesia, MDS-UPDRS validation, Motor fluctuations, Wearing-off, Adult, Humans, Mental Status and Dementia Tests, Middle Aged, Parkinson Disease, Sensitivity and Specificity, Single-Blind Method, Parkinson Disease, General Medicine, Gold standard (test), Middle Aged, Motor fluctuation, medicine.disease, Mental Status and Dementia Tests, Confidence interval, Motor fluctuations, Psychiatry and Mental health, Neurology (clinical), medicine.symptom, business, 030217 neurology & neurosurgery
الوصف: Background: In a precedent paper, we validated part IV of the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) for detecting motor fluctuations in Parkinson’s Disease (PD) patients using a 12-h Waking-Day Motor Assessment (WDMA) as gold standard, showing a high sensitivity (> 80%) and a lower specificity (< 45%). The aim of this study was to validate the Movement Disorder Society-UPDRS (MDS-UPDRS) part IV, especially items 4.3 and 4.5, using the same methodology. Methods: PD patients attending the Movement Disorders Clinic at the University Hospital in Catania were consecutively enrolled in the study. A diurnal WDMA was performed to detect motor fluctuations. At each time interval, the motor impairment was evaluated using the motor section of the MDS-UPDRS. Presence or absence of motor fluctuations and the type of motor fluctuation were assessed by four blinded expert raters in movement disorders, by evaluating the graphical representations of the WDMA. We evaluated sensitivity and specificity together with 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of items 4.3 and 4.5, using WDMA as gold standard. Results: We estimated for item 4.3 of the MDS-UPDRS a sensitivity of 74.3% (95% CI 56.7–87.5) and a specificity of 70.6% (95% CI 44–89.7), while for item 4.5, a sensitivity of 67.9% (95% CI 47.6–84.1) and a specificity of 66.7% (95% CI 44.7–84.4). Conclusions: The present showed a higher specificity level for MDS-UPDRS with respect to the UPDRS, while a slightly lower sensitivity mainly for predictable OFF.
اللغة: English
URL الوصول: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::ccca6dae7c7ec72e92daabcfcd8a6d4c
http://hdl.handle.net/10281/279167
حقوق: CLOSED
رقم الأكسشن: edsair.doi.dedup.....ccca6dae7c7ec72e92daabcfcd8a6d4c
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE