Do Behavioral Observations Make People Catch the Goal? A Meta-Analysis on Goal Contagion
| العنوان: | Do Behavioral Observations Make People Catch the Goal? A Meta-Analysis on Goal Contagion |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Brohmer, Hilmar, Eckerstorfer, Lisa V., van Aert, Robbie C. M., Corcoran, Katja |
| المساهمون: | Department of Methodology and Statistics |
| المصدر: | International Review of Social Psychology, Vol 34, Iss 1 (2021) International Review of Social Psychology; Vol 34, No 1 (2021); 3 International Review of Social Psychology, 34(1):3. Ubiquity Press Ltd. |
| بيانات النشر: | Ubiquity Press, 2021. |
| سنة النشر: | 2021 |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: | Open science, Social Psychology, media_common.quotation_subject, POWER, MOTIVES, MODELS, Control (management), lcsh:BF1-990, 050109 social psychology, CONDUCTING METAANALYSES, 050105 experimental psychology, Presentation, Selection (linguistics), 0501 psychology and cognitive sciences, media_common, publication bias, OBJECT, goal contagion, goal pursuit, automatic inference, meta-analysis, ESTIMATING EFFECT SIZE, 05 social sciences, Contrast (statistics), MOTIVATION, PURSUIT, Publication bias, Moderation, lcsh:Psychology, Meta-analysis, REPLICATION, social psychology, social cognition, Psychology, Cognitive psychology |
| الوصف: | Goal contagion is a social-cognitive approach to understanding how other people's behavior influences one's goal pursuit: An observation of goal-directed behavior leads to an automatic inference and activation of the goal before it can be adopted and pursued thereafter by the observer. We conducted a meta-analysis focusing on experimental studies with a goal condition, depicting goal-directed behavior and a control condition. We searched four databases (PsychInfo, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, and JSTOR) and the citing literature on Google Scholar, and eventually included e = 48 effects from published studies, unpublished studies and registered reports based on 4751 participants. The meta-analytic summary effect was small - g = 0.30, 95%CI [0.21; 0.40], tau(2) = 0.05, 95%CI [0.03, 0.13] - implying that goal contagion might occur for some people, compared to when this goal is not perceived in behavior. However, the original effect seemed to be biased through the current publication system. As shown by several publication-bias tests, the effect could rather be half the size, for example, selection model: g = 0.15, 95%CI [-0.02; 0.32]. Further, we could not detect any potential moderator (such as the presentation of the manipulation and the contrast of the control condition). We suggest that future research on goal contagion makes use of open science practices to advance research in this domain. |
| وصف الملف: | application/pdf; application/xml |
| اللغة: | English |
| تدمد: | 2397-8570 |
| URL الوصول: | https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::d15a50379a28f709f3310975af77288e https://www.rips-irsp.com/articles/428 |
| حقوق: | OPEN |
| رقم الأكسشن: | edsair.doi.dedup.....d15a50379a28f709f3310975af77288e |
| قاعدة البيانات: | OpenAIRE |
| تدمد: | 23978570 |
|---|