Is a definitive trial of prehospital continuous positive airway pressure versus standard oxygen therapy for acute respiratory failure indicated? The ACUTE pilot randomised controlled trial

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Is a definitive trial of prehospital continuous positive airway pressure versus standard oxygen therapy for acute respiratory failure indicated? The ACUTE pilot randomised controlled trial
المؤلفون: Alexander J Scott, Matthew Ward, Gavin D. Perkins, Tim Harris, Maggie Marsh, Praveen Thokala, Imogen Gunson, Josh Miller, Andy Rosser, Cindy Cooper, Gordon Fuller, Mike Bradburn, Samuel Keating, Esther Herbert, Steve Goodacre
المصدر: BMJ Open
BMJ Open, Vol 10, Iss 7 (2020)
بيانات النشر: BMJ Publishing Group, 2020.
سنة النشر: 2020
مصطلحات موضوعية: adult thoracic medicine, Adult, medicine.medical_specialty, medicine.medical_treatment, Psychological intervention, lcsh:Medicine, Pilot Projects, law.invention, Randomized controlled trial, law, RA0421, Oxygen therapy, accident & emergency medicine, medicine, Humans, Acute respiratory failure, Continuous positive airway pressure, Respiratory system, adult intensive & critical care, Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Continuous Positive Airway Pressure, Respiratory distress, business.industry, lcsh:R, General Medicine, R1, Oxygen, Emergency medicine, Emergency Medicine, Breathing, Respiratory Insufficiency, business, RA
الوصف: ObjectivesTo determine the feasibility of a large-scale definitive multicentre trial of prehospital continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in acute respiratory failure.DesignA single-centre, open-label, individual patient randomised, controlled, external pilot trial.SettingA single UK Ambulance Service, between August 2017 and July 2018.ParticipantsAdults with respiratory distress and peripheral oxygen saturations below British Thoracic Society target levels despite controlled oxygen treatment.InterventionsPatients were randomised to prehospital CPAP (O-Two system) versus standard oxygen therapy in a 1:1 ratio using simple randomisation.Primary and secondary outcome measuresFeasibility outcomes comprised recruitment rate, adherence to allocated treatment, retention and data completeness. The primary clinical outcome was 30-day mortality.Results77 patients were enrolled (target 120), including 7 cases with a diagnosis where CPAP could be ineffective or harmful. CPAP was fully delivered in 74% (target 75%). There were no major protocol violations. Full data were available for all key outcomes (targets ≥90%). Overall 30-day mortality was 27.3%. Of these deceased patients, 14/21 (68%) either did not have a respiratory condition or had ceiling of treatment decisions implemented excluding hospital non-invasive ventilation and critical care.ConclusionsRecruitment rate was below target and feasibility was not demonstrated. Limited compliance with CPAP, and difficulty in identifying patients who could benefit from CPAP, indicate that prehospital CPAP is unlikely to materially reduce mortality. A definitive effectiveness trial of CPAP is therefore not recommended.Trial registration numberISRCTN12048261; Post-results.
وصف الملف: application/pdf
اللغة: English
تدمد: 2044-6055
URL الوصول: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::d40520029e2104b62b5b53671983634f
حقوق: OPEN
رقم الأكسشن: edsair.doi.dedup.....d40520029e2104b62b5b53671983634f
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE