The Epidermolysis Bullosa Disease Activity and Scarring Index (EBDASI): grading disease severity and assessing responsiveness to clinical change in epidermolysis bullosa

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: The Epidermolysis Bullosa Disease Activity and Scarring Index (EBDASI): grading disease severity and assessing responsiveness to clinical change in epidermolysis bullosa
المؤلفون: David Orchard, John C Su, Swaranjali V. Jain, Lachlan Warren, Hamish McManus, Adam G. Harris, Dedee F. Murrell
المصدر: Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
بيانات النشر: Wiley, 2016.
سنة النشر: 2016
مصطلحات موضوعية: Adult, Male, medicine.medical_specialty, Adolescent, Minimal Clinically Important Difference, Dermatology, Severity of Illness Index, Cicatrix, Young Adult, 030207 dermatology & venereal diseases, 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, Autoimmune and Bullous Diseases, Original Articles and Short Reports, Severity of illness, medicine, Humans, Prospective Studies, 030212 general & internal medicine, Young adult, Child, Prospective cohort study, Receiver operating characteristic, business.industry, Minimal clinically important difference, Infant, Middle Aged, medicine.disease, Clinical trial, Infectious Diseases, Standard error, ROC Curve, Area Under Curve, Child, Preschool, Disease Progression, Original Article, Female, Epidermolysis bullosa, Epidermolysis Bullosa, business
الوصف: Background The lack of validated outcome measures for epidermolysis bullosa (EB) presents major barriers to evaluating disease severity and comparing the efficacy of therapies. The Epidermolysis Bullosa Disease Activity and Scarring Index (EBDASI) was recently introduced as a valid and reliable instrument for EB; however, its interpretation for use in clinical practice and clinical trials is yet to be defined. Objective To assess the interpretability of the EBDASI in classifying patients according to disease severity and clinical response. Methods A total of 53 outpatients with EB at two interstate institutions were prospectively evaluated. At each visit, the principal dermatologist completed the EBDASI and global assessments of disease severity and change. Classifications for mild, moderate and severe disease using the EBDASI were determined using receiver operating characteristic curves. Minimal clinically important differences for the EBDASI activity subscale were calculated and compared with the standard error of measurement. Results Total EBDASI score ranges of 0–42, 43–106 and 107–506 corresponded to mild, moderate and severe disease respectively. Reduction in EBDASI activity scores of greater than 9 indicated clinically significant improvement. An increase of 3 in the activity score indicated deterioration. Conclusion The EBDASI is a responsive tool and may be useful in characterizing disease severity and response. The cut-offs proposed in this study provide the first practical guide for interpreting the EBDASI, further supporting its use for longitudinal patient assessment and in clinical trials.
تدمد: 0926-9959
URL الوصول: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::da4caf5e172420389e7172c024b94d55
https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.13953
حقوق: OPEN
رقم الأكسشن: edsair.doi.dedup.....da4caf5e172420389e7172c024b94d55
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE