Utilisation of pain counselling in osteopathic practice: secondary analysis of a nationally representative sample of Australian osteopaths

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Utilisation of pain counselling in osteopathic practice: secondary analysis of a nationally representative sample of Australian osteopaths
المؤلفون: Kylie Fitzgerald, Phil Austin, Brett Vaughan, Jane Mulcahy, Michael Fleischmann, Shane Pritchard
بيانات النشر: De Gruyter, 2020.
سنة النشر: 2020
مصطلحات موضوعية: Counseling, medicine.medical_specialty, Practice-based research network, 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, Back pain, medicine, Humans, 030212 general & internal medicine, business.industry, Professional development, Australia, 1103 Clinical Sciences, Guideline, Odds ratio, Osteopathic medicine in the United States, Low back pain, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Family medicine, Osteopathic Physicians, Neurology (clinical), medicine.symptom, business, Low Back Pain, Inclusion (education), Osteopathic Medicine, 030217 neurology & neurosurgery
الوصف: Objectives Advice, reassurance and education are recommended as first line treatments for musculoskeletal pain conditions such as low back pain. Osteopaths are registered primary contact allied health professionals in the Australian healthcare system who primarily manage acute and chronic musculoskeletal pain conditions. This study aimed to investigate the proportion of Australian osteopaths who do and do not utilise advice, reassurance and education (pain counselling) in their clinical practice, and determine the characteristics associated with the frequency of using pain counselling in clinical practice. Methods A secondary analysis of practice characteristics from a nationally representative sample of Australian osteopaths was undertaken. Participants completed a 27-item practice characteristics questionnaire between July-December 2016. Bivariate analyses were used to identify significant variables for inclusion in a backward multiple logistic regression model. Adjusted odds ratios (OR) were calculated for significant variables. Results Responses were received from 991 Australian osteopaths, representing 49% of the profession. Of these 264 (26.64%) indicated often utilising pain counselling, and 727 (73.36%) reported not often utilising pain counselling. Those who utilised pain counselling were more than twice as likely to report research evidence had a high impact on their clinical practice (OR 2.11), and nearly twice as likely to discuss physical activity with their patients (OR 1.84). Conclusions Pain counselling is under-utilised by nearly three quarters of the Australian osteopathic profession as a management strategy. Future studies are required to explore the reasons why most in the profession comprised in this sample are infrequently utilising this guideline recommendation. Given the frequency of chronic musculoskeletal pain conditions presenting to Australian osteopaths, strategies appear to be needed to advance the profession via professional development in accessing and using evidence-based care for pain conditions.
وصف الملف: Print-Electronic; application/pdf
اللغة: English
URL الوصول: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::dbb1f7da78a5cccedfda968d7384a7ea
https://hdl.handle.net/10453/158264
حقوق: OPEN
رقم الأكسشن: edsair.doi.dedup.....dbb1f7da78a5cccedfda968d7384a7ea
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE