A randomized trial investigating the efficacy and safety of water soluble micellar paclitaxel (Paccal® Vet) for treatment of nonresectable grade 2 or 3 mast cell tumors in dogs

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: A randomized trial investigating the efficacy and safety of water soluble micellar paclitaxel (Paccal® Vet) for treatment of nonresectable grade 2 or 3 mast cell tumors in dogs
المؤلفون: Cheryl A. London, Mona P. Rosenberg, Alexandra Sahora, Anthony Rusk, Nicole C. Northrup, L. Fulton, Mary K. Klein, Sara Westberg, Brenda Phillips, David M. Vail, S. Siegel, Elizabeth A. McNiel, J.L. Winter, Lisa G. Barber, Joanna S. Morris, H. von Euler, Robyn E. Elmslie, M. Martano, G. S. Post, Chand Khanna, Johannes Hirschberger, Craig A. Clifford, David M. Ruslander, Gerry Polton, Douglas H. Thamm
سنة النشر: 2012
مصطلحات موضوعية: Male, medicine.medical_specialty, medicine.medical_treatment, Mast-Cell Sarcoma, canine, Pharmacology, chemotherapy, Gastroenterology, Statistics, Nonparametric, Article, taxane, law.invention, chemistry.chemical_compound, paclitaxel, Dogs, Randomized controlled trial, Double-Blind Method, law, Internal medicine, Clinical endpoint, medicine, Animals, cancer, Dog Diseases, Prospective Studies, Adverse effect, Micelles, Chemotherapy, Taxane, General Veterinary, business.industry, Lomustine, Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic, Micellar Paclitaxel, Treatment Outcome, Paclitaxel, chemistry, Female, business, medicine.drug
الوصف: Background Effective treatments for dogs with advanced stage mast cell tumors (MCT) remain a pressing need. A micellar formulation of paclitaxel (paclitaxel [micellar]) has shown promise in early-phase studies. Hypothesis/Objectives The objective was to demonstrate greater activity for paclitaxel (micellar) compared with lomustine. The null hypothesis was μp = μL (ie, proportion of responders for the paclitaxel [micellar] and lomustine groups, respectively). Animals Two hundred and fifty-two dogs with advanced stage nonresectable grade 2 or 3 MCT. Methods Prospective multicenter randomized double-blind positive-controlled clinical trial. The primary endpoint was confirmed overall response rate (CORR) at 14 weeks. A secondary endpoint, biologic observed response rate (BORR), also was calculated. Safety was assessed by the characterization and grading of adverse events (AE). Results Overall CORR (7% versus 1%; P = .048) and BORR (23% versus 10%; P = .012) were greater for paclitaxel (micellar) compared with lomustine. Paclitaxel (micellar)-treated dogs were 6.5 times more likely to have a confirmed response and 3.1 times more likely to experience a biologic observed response. The majority of AE with paclitaxel (micellar) were transient and clinically manageable. Twenty-seven dogs (33%) receiving lomustine were discontinued because of hepatopathy compared with 3 dogs (2%) receiving paclitaxel (micellar) (P
اللغة: English
URL الوصول: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::e772b44abe3b4223117ff140fd9d22e0
http://hdl.handle.net/2318/90904
حقوق: OPEN
رقم الأكسشن: edsair.doi.dedup.....e772b44abe3b4223117ff140fd9d22e0
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE