The use of patient-specific measurement instruments in the process of goal-setting: a systematic review of available instruments and their feasibility
| العنوان: | The use of patient-specific measurement instruments in the process of goal-setting: a systematic review of available instruments and their feasibility |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Trudy van der Weijden, Anita Stevens, Albère Köke, Anna Beurskens |
| المساهمون: | Promovendi PHPC, Family Medicine, Revalidatiegeneeskunde, RS: CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care |
| المصدر: | Clinical Rehabilitation, 27, 11, pp. 1005-19 Clinical Rehabilitation, 27, 1005-19 Clinical Rehabilitation, 27(11), 1005-1019. SAGE Publications Ltd |
| بيانات النشر: | SAGE Publications, 2013. |
| سنة النشر: | 2013 |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: | Value of Life, measurement instrument, Process management, Process (engineering), Implementation Science [NCEBP 3], Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, CINAHL, Goal Attainment Scaling, systematic review, Humans, Goal-setting, Medicine, Goal setting, Management science, business.industry, Rehabilitation, Reproducibility of Results, Patient Preference, Patient specific, Patient Outcome Assessment, Measuring instrument, Feasibility Studies, Thematic analysis, business, Goals, Strengths and weaknesses, feasibility |
| الوصف: | Objective: The aim of this study was to identify the currently available patient-specific measurement instruments used in the process of goal-setting and to assess their feasibility. Methods: After a systematic search in PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsychINFO and REHABDATA, patient-specific instruments were included, structured in a goal-setting practice framework and subjected to a qualitative thematic analysis of feasibility. Results: A total of 25 patient-specific instruments were identified and 11 were included. These instruments can be used for goal negotiation, goal-setting and evaluation. Each instrument has its own strengths and weaknesses during the different phases of the goal-setting process. Objective feasibility data were revealed for all instruments such as administration time, instruction, training and availability. Subjective feasibility could only be analysed for the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure, Goal Attainment Scaling, Self-Identified Goal Assessment and Talking Mats. Relevant themes were that Canadian Occupational Performance Measure and Goal Attainment Scaling were time consuming and difficult for patients with cognitive problems, but they facilitated goal-setting in a client-centred approach. Talking Mats was especially feasible for patients with cognitive and communication impairments. Conclusions: A total of 11 instruments were identified, and although some had strong points, there is no single good instrument that can be recommended specifically. Applying a combination of the strengths of the available instruments within a goal-setting framework can improve goal setting and tailor it to individual patients. |
| تدمد: | 1477-0873 0269-2155 |
| URL الوصول: | https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::e9d780d9762635470c5fe876bbcf5348 https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215513490178 |
| حقوق: | RESTRICTED |
| رقم الأكسشن: | edsair.doi.dedup.....e9d780d9762635470c5fe876bbcf5348 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | OpenAIRE |
| تدمد: | 14770873 02692155 |
|---|